Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 34.2K All Categories
- 28.8K LSAT
- 17.4K General
- 5.3K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 72 Podcasts
- 192 Webinars
- 13 Scholarships
- 193 Test Center Reviews
- 2.4K Study Groups
- 118 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.6K Specific LSAT Dates
- 38 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 10 September 2024 LSAT
- 41 August 2024 LSAT
- 30 June 2024 LSAT
- 5 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 23 January 2024 LSAT
- 38 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5.1K Not LSAT
- 4.1K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 670 Technical Problems
- 292 Off-topic
Is 'neither or' inclusive?
lonelycarbon
Alum Member
Let's say neither G nor K are in row 1. Does that mean these are the possibilities: G is not in row 1, or K is not in row 1, or both G and K are not in row 1? Could we have a situation where G is in row 2 and K could be in row 1? So if only one of the conditions are met, then the other item could or could not be in row 1?
I came across this type of logic in a logic game and got confused...
Comments
"Neither nor" means both G and K are not in row 1. Even if G is in row 2, K still cannot be in row 1. The opposite is true, as well.
I believe "neither nor" means that both are not included.