@spittingnickels said:
I use a yellow legal pad and g207 blue ink pens. I go through each answer choice, writing out why I did or did not pick that answer choice
I also try to explain the structure/reasoning of stimulus. Does it use conditional logic? is it descriptive? some causal logic? I also always identify a prephrase. Even on questions where prephrasing is a time sink, in blind review (in the words of jacob feldman, it should be a BR journal, not a WA journal!!) it forces you to 100% understand the stimulus, and not rely just on your intuition. your intuition might be great. but metacognition is better.
Comments
I use a yellow legal pad and g207 blue ink pens. I go through each answer choice, writing out why I did or did not pick that answer choice
I also try to explain the structure/reasoning of stimulus. Does it use conditional logic? is it descriptive? some causal logic? I also always identify a prephrase. Even on questions where prephrasing is a time sink, in blind review (in the words of jacob feldman, it should be a BR journal, not a WA journal!!) it forces you to 100% understand the stimulus, and not rely just on your intuition. your intuition might be great. but metacognition is better.
I use a tablet for my WAJ, so I can insert an image of the question with the answer choices and can annotate on it.
It takes a while, but it is so worth it!
Thank you, guy