All Discussions
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Sign In with 7Sage
Register
Sign In with 7Sage
Sign In
Apply for Membership
Categories
All Discussions
Activity
Categories
34.3K
All Categories
28.8K
LSAT
17.4K
General
5.3K
Logical Reasoning
1.4K
Reading Comprehension
1.7K
Logic Games
72
Podcasts
192
Webinars
30
Newsletters
13
Scholarships
193
Test Center Reviews
2.4K
Study Groups
119
Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
2.6K
Specific LSAT Dates
38
November 2024 LSAT
18
October 2024 LSAT
10
September 2024 LSAT
41
August 2024 LSAT
30
June 2024 LSAT
5
April 2024 LSAT
11
February 2024 LSAT
23
January 2024 LSAT
38
November 2023 LSAT
43
October 2023 LSAT
14
September 2023 LSAT
38
August 2023 LSAT
27
June 2023 LSAT
30
Sage Advice
5.1K
Not LSAT
4.1K
Law School Admissions
13
Law School Explained
13
Bar
10
Forum Rules
675
Technical Problems
291
Off-topic
Please refresh my memory
Edsaintvil
Alum
Member
October 2014
edited October 2014
in
Logical Reasoning
46 karma
On what kinds of questions are those invalid existential conclusions relevant?
Like, A-->B some C
And we can't conclude A some C.
Are these in must be false questions? Has anyone come across a question that deals with this kind of bad conclusion?
Comments
cole.w.murdoch
Alum
Member
October 2014
228 karma
Parallel method of reasoning, parallel flaw method of reasoning, must be true, must be false. That's what I can remember off the top of my head.
Edsaintvil
Alum
Member
October 2014
46 karma
Ah, thanks a lot!
Sign In
or
Register
to comment.
Comments