Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 34.2K All Categories
- 28.8K LSAT
- 17.4K General
- 5.3K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 72 Podcasts
- 192 Webinars
- 13 Scholarships
- 193 Test Center Reviews
- 2.4K Study Groups
- 118 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.6K Specific LSAT Dates
- 38 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 10 September 2024 LSAT
- 41 August 2024 LSAT
- 30 June 2024 LSAT
- 5 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 23 January 2024 LSAT
- 38 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5.1K Not LSAT
- 4.1K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 670 Technical Problems
- 292 Off-topic
PT40.S3.Q26 - north american ph.d. programs
lsatyayy
Alum Member
Hi. Could anyone tell me why (c) weakens the arg? Isn't it irrelevant that it talks about errors of the data? Thank you in advance!! Happy studying everyone.
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-3-question-26/
Comments
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-3-question-26/
Here is 7sage's explanation...
@lsatyayy
Just did this question earlier this week!
So for (C) if the number of errors in the reporting data have increased, then that casts doubt on the argument presented in the stim, that because of the data reported, they conclude a decline in those choosing art history as a career. If the data reporting is off then that certainly weakens the argument.
@Alex Divine
Gosh. I see it now. And I don't know what I was thinking... Thank you Alex!! Thank you! Thank you!