Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Accounts Playable
About
- Username
- Accounts Playable
- Joined
- Visits
- 4,927
- Last Active
- Roles
- Sage, ⭐
Comments
-
It wouldn't necessarily be true because we don't know about how the poll was conducted. If the poll is assumed to be representative (with a large and varied sample), then I think “Most people think the government policy is not one of appeasement” w…
-
https://classic.7sage.com/preptests/ You can always find this link by clicking Course/Extensions and Add ons. Then, scroll down a little to find the link.
-
I always go back to the rule substitution question first; it's almost always the question that I am least confident about. I also go back to my circled questions (during LG, I circle questions where I don't read all of the answer choices) and doubl…
-
Thanks for the reply! So, is the percentage given equal to (Currently registered cars that had major engine repairs/Cars manufactured that decade)? To illustrate, does the10% mean that 10% of the NMC cars manufactured during the 1970s are still re…
-
Not sure about Ultimate vs Ultimate+ differences. Sounds like something @"Dillon A. Wright" can clarify.
-
They haven't been removed. You can find them here: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-explanations/
-
Since N implies both R and S out, N has a not both relationship with R and with S. Thus, depending on the relationships to the other rules, at least one of N/R and N/S must be out (maybe N, R, or S are all out, maybe only RS are out, etc). However…
-
The LR data for the last 5 questions is pretty much in line with my anecdotal evidence. For the last 5-6 questions on LR, I usually find myself reading answer choice E first and reading my way up to A. I think there is a discontinuity with E due t…
-
Yes. Assume that "or" is inclusive unless explicitly stated otherwise (i.e. "not both").
-
"Or" in both cases is inclusive, so yes to both questions. 1.) Both could be out 2.) Both could be in
-
Eh, I think I'll just watch this later
-
@"Cant Get Right" I don't think this is quite it. "People" is the subject and the "who" (besides being a very good rock band) modifies "people." So, the "People who..." is just indicating a very specific set of people that is the subject of the se…
-
No, they are not. Say we have this set of things: A/B A/B A/B /AB Some As are not Bs (3 As are in fact not Bs). Some not As are Bs (one not A is a . Those two sets are different since their elements are different. For two sets to be equal, t…
-
@runiggyrun I love my surface, and it's easily one of the best pieces of tech that I've ever purchased. I don't have a problem with the keyboard.
-
Microsoft Surface>>>>>Mac. I hated using a Mac, but that was due to the fact that Excel is garbage on a Mac (which I needed to use a lot for work/undergrad). I'll definitely be using my Surface for law school unless I'm convinced ot…
-
Strange. The email I got stated that there will be a section with differential equations, topology, fluid mechanics, and algebraic number theory. The good thing is that the LSAC FINALLY said they were getting rid of the stupid essay. They were ju…
-
@twssmith haha no problem! I'm looking forward to our next session!
-
I think it's also helpful to know that an argument from analogy cannot ever, ever be a valid argument because at some point, there is going to be a relevant or practical difference between the two things being compared; plus, the definition of valid…
-
Purdue and IU people coming together. The LSAT is a beautiful thing sometimes haha
-
Nice!
-
Yes, the conditional above is still true since it necessarily follows that in every single major war occurring in the past 200 years there must have been a build up of arms. However, the flaw isn't a problem with the conditional statement, it's wit…
-
Yes. I was allowed to.
-
I had to put my answer sheet in my lap and I put the test on the small desk. It was very annoying.
-
I took it at IU. Here's my test center review: https://classic.7sage.com/discussion#/discussion/6885/test-center-review-indiana-university-bloomington-in
-
I think I found it. It's 16.3.15. This is a parallel flaw question, and it's a very subtle flaw. This is one of the hardest parallel questions I've seen in a while! I think the flaw has to do with the relative nature of "tall." I don't know any…
-
Are you sure you have the correct question? 15.3.15 according to my PTs is a question about high school students and working 15 hours/week.
-
Thanks everyone! @"J.Y. Ping" @Micaela_OVO @"The 180 Bro_OVO" @twssmith @Lolo2222
-
@"Can’t Get Right" Argument by analogy: if 7Sage is Spaceballs, then law school is Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money LOL
-
The answer to this question doesn't need to be false since the question asks us "each of the following must also be true on the basis of them EXCEPT"; the correct answer could just be not provable based on the stimulus. Answer E could actually be a…
-
This is a must be true/inference EXCEPT question, so 4 answer choices are valid inferences while one answer choice either must be false or it isn't provable. Essentially, we have one long chain: World's most beautiful cats SOME Persian--->Pompou…