Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Ashley2018-1
About
- Username
- Ashley2018-1
- Joined
- Visits
- 3,390
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Ok...so from the statements we have, we cannot deduce the number of books in any of the categories? (Fiction manuscripts submitted by Literary agent, Fiction manuscripts requested directly from writers, etc)
-
But aren't the first and last sentences basically saying the same thing? In that case, how could I tell which is the MC and which the support? I get that there's a gap between extrinsic and "symbolize" but is there a less mechanical way of being abl…
-
I've gotten this question wrong so many times before realizing that I needed to go back to the stimulus and actually understand what was going on because if you can do that, then questions 18 and 19 aren't that bad. So what is the issue at hand? It…
-
There is an apparent paradox going on in this question and I say apparent because there are potential way stop resolve the discrepancy. If it were true that money derives value from scarcity no matter the culture, then why is the case these people w…
-
I don't like that explanation for C. Believe me, I already looked at the explanations before coming here. Just saying the answer choice is "weak" isn't enough for me since this is a weaken question and even tipping the scales a little is supposed to…
-
I think it’s more along the lines of there’s no need to change the name to “lite” if the term “imitation” is already driving people to purchase foods with lower butterfat content, which was the whole reason the author thought manufacturers should ch…
-
If the answer choice did say all, I would not have picked it because even the word most made me not want to pick this answer....I actually picked C on first pass...I know JY has his own explanation for why it's correct but the idea of global warming…
-
Watching someone who looks like you versus actually watching yourself are two different things but because this is just a weakening question, this choice is ok right since watching a genetically identical copy to you is similar enough? The uncertain…
-
Hm. Since most can potentially include all, would it be ok then for mss? Assuming all the other answers were exactly the same. Or would that be stretching.
-
If it had said almost all or all scientists would that also be most strongly supported?
-
Yeah...I can see how watching your twin is probably the closest an individual can get to watching himself and I suppose that was where the LSAT was going with this answer choice, but if the twin were to recognize that the individual he is watching i…
-
Thank you for responding. So even if the identical twin happens to realize the individual he or she is watching is not himself but his (identical) sibling, this still weakens the argument because he is still over reporting deliberately? I thought t…
-
Could I assume that applies to all climatologists? That "nothing brings more recognition than overthrowing conventional wisdom?"
-
Hey could someone get to my question? The whole twin nonsense is confusing af. If the twin recognizes that he or she is watching someone else (his twin), would that strengthen or weaken?
-
But what if the twin doesn't recognize that he or she is watching himself but mistakenly thinks he is watching another individual? This whole twin thing is still confusing to me. Am I supposed to assume that a twin watching his other twin is suppose…
-
Would it matter if the twin recognizes that he or she is looking at their twin and not himself?
-
Thanks I was also attracted to answer choice D; I read the thread and the consensus appears to be that it wasn't describing a flaw at all. Is the conclusion about two beliefs rather than one?
-
The question I am referring to is from PT22.S2.Q25. Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-25/
-
No, I get that but in the question I was doing, it had R--->C in the premises and it concluded C--->R. I thought that was a Mistaken Reversal, or a conflation of necessary with sufficient but the correct answer choice had confusing sufficient …
-
I wasn't sure because mistaken reversals and negations are presented separately so I thought mistaking S for N and N for S were separate. So whether the ac said confuses a N condition for S or S for N, they are both correct? As for answer choice D,…
-
The answer choice says confusing S for N though. That is why I am confused. PT 22, Section 2, #25
-
https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q13-although-most-builders-do-not-consider-the-experimenta-t6876.html
-
For my second question, I am trying to think of why the argument was flawed. Ok, now I am really confused because I read an online solution and that is kind of what they were saying. I never said the ones who regularly use papercrete have never used…
-
You have so many requests but could you squeeze me in? Much appreciated
-
S (Savings account) ---> IB (Interest-bearing account) IB---s--- /T Conclusion: (So is indicator word) S---s---/T (tax-free) A---s---B---->C C: A---s----C and C---s---A are the only two valid conclusions you can draw you cannot combine th…
-
If you have a good amount of time, I would strongly recommend you to try out and experiment with as many sources as you can. There isn't one book or method that will magically make your score. You have to find out what works for you and that can tak…
-
Joe Biden was 78 when he became President and did so after three tries!
-
Unfortunately, at this point there just isn't anything you can do about that. Let's just hope things go back to normal so we can actually physically attend law school so it will be worth the wait.
-
Yes, you do. Most, if not all, law schools have already filled up their seats. The earliest you can apply is for the Fall 2022 cycle. But the scores are good for five years. Take you time and enjoy life.
-
3 minute per passage?! Bruh.