Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Ashley2018-1
About
- Username
- Ashley2018-1
- Joined
- Visits
- 3,390
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Being capable is an exception to the rule, isn't it? normally if the driver is involved in PI or PD>500 then he is legally required to report the accident except/unless he is capable of doing so. So I've seen different people explain/diagram this…
-
oh, so is that why the answer is B because: If Ted's car was damaged in excess of 500 (PD>500)----> LR----> /C (incapable?) and for unless the driver is incapable, in normal english that would translate to: if the driver is capable of repo…
-
Isn't unless "not" so Not Incapable so that's a double negative so capable? this question was from LR
-
yeah this games section was icky. I had to watch videos for all before being able to do them.
-
I did alright, had some issues with game 3 and 4 so had to watch the JY videos for it
-
How would you explain E?
-
am I approaching this the wrong way? is maintenance burns not only referring to the specific type of fire (natural versus intentionally set/man-made) but to the purpose of the fire, to "maintain" the forests (clear out extra brush so when fires happ…
-
I originally thought maintenance burns was referring only to intentionally set fires because in the phrase right before it it says "once fuels are reduced by these fires" and fuels means buildup of brush and I thought "these" fires was referring to …
-
Same, especially when I get a "weird" or "random" game. It just blows my entire section
-
The line before 55 talks about fires that were set intentionally and ones that were allowed to burn so is that how we are supposed to draw the link between maintenance burns and both of these types of fires?
-
I did hover over E, but didn't like the "naturally" set fires why does it include that? My impression of maintenance from the passage is as you said, it is intentionally set by people
-
Oops. But yeah, I've had study partners as well and they disappear mysteriously into oblivion after a zoom session or two despite me messaging them. Has happened to me more than once.
-
I'd be cautious about study groups on this site; I've found that many will message you all excited but will stop messaging. Ghosting is a very common occurrence here and I wouldn't join a study group with more than one person. It can get very diffic…
-
I don't think she should totally exclude tutoring; she should give it a try and see if it works. When I started studying, so many told me I didn't need a tutor and so I self-studied but found that I needed help, help that couldn't come from pre-reco…
-
The argument assumes the depositors aren't already bearing the costs of the insurance premium so by paying depositors lower interest rates on insured deposits than uninsured, they are already passing on the costs to the primary beneficiaries of the …
-
Answer choice B is supported by one of the premises in the stimulus: if it were true that people generally walk to the library only if it is located close to their homes, then it is not necessarily true that relocating the library to G would make it…
-
did you post the question? I don't see it...
-
I recommend getting together with one to two people max! If there are too many people, it can get disorganized quickly! and I've gotten ghosted so many times on this site for study groups lol so I second the comment above me!
-
I know in your example, you set "up until this past year" as 3 years ago up until the past year, but is there a time limit to that? like can we go even further back? this nuance is a bit confusing
-
Assuming what I said above was correct, the flaw is: the students do want a different food vendor but it doesn't mean they would necessarily want to go back to what they had up until the past year: HDS even if it were the only alternative available
-
Oh, I misunderstood that. Hm, is it because of "up until" this past year? If it said "this past year," then would it match what I was saying in my earlier comments? For the past year until the present, the students' food vendor was Hall Dining Servi…
-
Doesn't this past year mean all the time from exactly a year ago until present? For example, if today is Dec 23rd, 2020 then this past year would be referring to all the time from Dec 23rd, 2019 to today, wouldn't it? Wouldn't that mean HDS IS their…
-
and it's odd that they wouldn't want the organ to go back to the way it was but the correct answer choice provides a potential reason why
-
ok, so even if something is modified, it has one original form (because the stimulus doesn't suggest otherwise) and the church's goal is to make sure the F church gets as close to that as possible
-
Oh. So I should read original as "pre-modification" and pre bombing I thought original was more...subjective
-
so the original design is referring to the form the church had pre-bombing and the foundation's goal is to restore the church to what it originally looked like.
-
I find that I am doing that ALOT "helping out answer choices" I was thinking for D, that it was modified several times so the church maybe had no way of pinpointing what the original design of the organ was so decided not to build it so they won't…
-
Yeah, I thought the missing details could show more non-human characteristics but it's been pointed out it could have gone the other way, so I thought it was flawed that the doctor was looking at potentially incomplete evidence.
-
Someone correct me if I am wrong! Proposed causal relationship in stimulus: Cause-Offering unlimited free shipping Effect- increase in mail-order sales. A.) No cause, no effect: no unlimited free shipping, no increase in mail-order sales (decreas…
-
I heard it was because it was supposed to stimulate my attention. It hasn't had much success with that though haha