Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
BinghamtonDave
About
- Username
- BinghamtonDave
- Joined
- Visits
- 13,658
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, ⭐, 🍌🍌
Comments
-
I don’t know anything about soccer (football) but I read this this morning, spot the flaw? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/06/14/russias-psychic-cat-achilles-predicts-winner-opening-world-cup/
-
July taker here, with September as my backup. I'll be there to support in any way needed.
-
Excellent catch @Nabintou from a problem deep in LSAT archives.
-
Off the top of my head: 83-1-22 might be kind of what you are looking for. Will think on this, if anything comes to mind later I will edit this post.
-
So a few things to discuss before the conversations gets off the ground: 1.There are plenty of people who have taken the LSAT 2,3,4 times and got into amazing schools from their 3rd or 4th attempt. So a retake is not necessarily going to be a huge …
-
The question you ask is a vast one. Grammar, particularly grammar parsing are aspects of the LSAT that are necessary skills for a high score. This is covered well in the "Grammar" section of the core curriculum. Please see the lessons starting he…
-
Another possible spot for a disagreement: the factual accuracy of a premise stated. This is a bit non-LSAT'ish, but on disagree questions, if one person states as fact that a certain proposition is true in the world, a possible disagreement can occ…
-
I believe this is a reach in my experience. The actual disagreement can occur in any number of spots: 1.Flat out disagreement about the conclusion 2. Disagreement about whether or not the evidence provide is sufficient for the conclusion 3.Disa…
-
Best of luck to everyone on the calls, I'm rooting for all of you!
-
Yes. From my experience this is normal. What fool proofing is going to do for you is narrow the difference between your good days and your bad days. With continued fool proofing you will start to see the good days being -0/-1 and the bad days being…
-
Lets say I said this: Floyd Mayweather Jr. is the pound-for-pound greatest boxer to ever live. He's more defensively skilled than anyone who has ever laced up a pair of boxing gloves. In sentence two, instead of saying "Floyd Mayweather Jr." agai…
-
When the people are displaying symptoms: lets say chest pain, further testing is provided. Note the first sentence here: the move from symptom to diagnosis. Presumably, someone can have a symptom without a diagnosis: chest pain could be something…
-
Reading in general does help, but nothing helps more than familiarization with RC passages themselves. To that end, consider looking at the acknowledgments on the last couple of pages of each PT. Here we can find the sources of the LSAT's material…
-
@"Logic Gainz" good work digging into the answer choices. One thing I will say is that there are basically two layers to cookie cutter flaws. There is the surface description to those flaws: containing the right combination of "buzzwords" (think h…
-
@"surfy surf" hope you are well: can't you just click "questions printable" here: https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/lr-drills-preptest-20-to-29/ and then just send them to your printer? As an aside, pre 20s are 100% worth the effort for the follo…
-
@LSATcantwin I actually laughed. Thank you for that PS, I'm not sure the words "hype conference call" have ever been strung together!
-
Its not necessarily a hype video, but tonight there will be pep rally for the June test takers. You are welcome to attend!
-
I look at it as “and.” So if I say: if the warriors win game three, this series is basically over, even if the cavs manage to win game four. What I’m saying is that the conditional statement: Win game three——->basically over Is allowed to e…
-
I watched the James Cameron documentary about going to the deep ocean I found it very motivating, partly because the whole thing terrified me, lol. Although not a movie, I came across this clip last night about Point Nemo, found it motivating, poe…
-
Do they have to be law related?
-
This is how I hope all my June study group people feel leaving the exam: https://media3.giphy.com/media/3o6vY5flG0zz1MQ1Py/giphy.gif
-
Yeah, @ColinTurner610 backing up on what we are doing on LG, in a nutshell: we are given a set of conditions that have embedded in both the condition itself and how that condition relates to the other conditions, inherent constraints for our game b…
-
I'm not aware of a situation where all the rules would ever be "wiped out." The rules are our conditions we must abide by in the construction of our game.
-
Working from memory, isn’t there a rule here where there cannot be two purples in a row? Meaning if there is a purple in 4 there must be a purple in 6? Meaning we are fulfilling the three given conditions: No consecutive colors Must be a purple …
-
Hello, @"Logic Gainz" hope you are well. I think a helpful, but maybe not entirely analogous line of reasoning would be something like this: In the NBA, the only indicator of a particular team's greatness is number of NBA championships. Therefor…
-
From this point forward in the lessons: https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/how-to-approach-argument-part-questions/ Argument part questions ask us to understand various parts of the argument we are provided. Understanding how these parts relate to/…
-
bump for those interested in review.