Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
BinghamtonDave
About
- Username
- BinghamtonDave
- Joined
- Visits
- 13,658
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, ⭐, 🍌🍌
Comments
-
@Hamaseh_S @teamteamvicster and I reunited for a November retake!
-
It is certainly possible. You are within the range that makes it possible. As a tutor, I really would like to see you at 162/161 two weeks out with a goal of 160 come test day, but where you are certainly isn’t bad. My advice is to thoroughly revi…
-
The mechanism by which NYU was able to do this was by raising the money: 450 million, including nearly a 100 million dollar donation from the founder of Home Depot (Langone). I believe the question we should be asking is whether or not something si…
-
It was a very informative meeting. Thank you for hosting this and giving us the opportunity to attend!
-
Count me in, I'm there for my retake.
-
@Gladiator_2017 yes, I think so: simplified argument: Conclusion: this water is not dangerous Premise: because it is just like this other water. (that we are not told anything about)
-
Normally, what people have generally found useful is to go over the exam and see where their approach did not work, so for instance if someone missed all the sufficient assumption questions when they sat for the exam, one would then go back to drill…
-
It’s the same theoretically as saying: Not all insects are ants But All ants are insects Not all cars are fords mustangs But all ford mustangs are cars The superset (cars/insects) is comprised of more things than the subset (ford mustangs/ant…
-
Yes, this more than likely signals an issue with timing rather than a fundamental misunderstanding of the material. Many people have had to close this gap between understanding a question during review and coming up short in that understanding duri…
-
Excellent work! And congrats my friend!
-
@"surfy surf" on test day I just couldn't "see" the connections for the games in my first section. It was my first take and games is statistically my best section. My first take taught me two things: 1.keep fighting even if I think I didn't perfor…
-
I got a 168, I'm very happy, but am planning a retake for a few extra points/possible scholarship money. It has been a long and exciting journey and I credit 7Sage with a huge part of my success. Philippians 4:13 Good luck to everyone getting thei…
-
Consider the following conditional relationship: In order for someone to be president of the USA they must be at least 35 years old. Given this conditional rule, prentend we are presented with the following 4 cases: -we find the president of the …
-
I've run dozens of scenarios in my head about how I will do on this exam, lol. My first take. I've been studying just in case a retake is in order. I've also been reading a ton of news that I might not usually take the time to go through to keep …
-
I'll be there this evening, picked back up my studying in case things aren't exactly where they need to be on my July score. I look forward to reviewing PT 75 with everyone!
-
The July 2018 LSAT is undisclosed. None of us will ever be able to see it, barring some special release in the future by LSAC in a "superprep" book.
-
thank you!
-
I never really gave this issue much thought. I want to thank those who stated their position. I think this is one of those occasions on the internet where as an onlooker, disagreement amongst others lead to me coming away from this conversation mo…
-
Dogs that howl at trains while being washed is real.
-
The last passage to mention was about the beauty of sports.
-
These are few I remember from Lr: all real just had two sections. -teddy bears that look like humans(?) -Kitten shrunk -paper currency Quebec -full time zookeepers -day light savings time Most of the exam was a blur. I’m editing this post…
-
Just got out. I had LG LR LG RC LR.
-
I’ve been giving the show a try from season 1 the past week or so as my reward for intense prep. To be honest, it doesn’t really do much for me. I’ll stick with it for a bit longer, but little things that should be covered just kind of annoy me abo…
-
Can you clarify what you mean by "cheat sheets"? And do you mean the logical indicator words?
-
Mr. Ping and crew: thank you for making PT 84 available in such a timely fashion! I really appreciate it.
-
6:30 would probably be best for the group. 6:30 gets my vote.
-
@"samantha.ashley92" either would probably work. For me it was after self studying and hitting a plateau.
-
Can you cite for us the "rule driven" games you reference? I'm interested in knowing what test they come from.
-
@ChaimtheGreat I believe the 4th game was the historical precursor to PT 72-game 4. The two games are really similar. They both have a similar key inference to them. -4 is good on that set first time through for sure.
-
I'm going to tag a very helpful member of these boards that might have some insight: @LSATcantwin