You should take as many PTs as it takes to consistently achieve your target score. However many tests that turns out to be depends on the individual.
I think I took basically all of them from 36+. I probably missed a few here and there, but not m…
Yeah, if you don't take your time and really absorb the information now, you'll have to spend that time later anyway when you find yourself constantly returning because you don't understand. Sounds to me like you're doing it right.
@orangebeer said:
Because I remember JY did many diagramming in sufficient assumpition family questions, I thought everyone does like what he does.
But maybe its not necessary?
Yeah, I'd be surprised to see JY diagram much at all on the actual tes…
@notguilty90 said:
sometimes I catch myself spending huge amounts of time dwelling on 2-3 remaining choices... Do you suggest I abondon and move on despite the time I already invested into the question? What if there is no time to return at the end…
Yeah, I wouldn't expect it to be an issue. Just smile and be friendly and that goes a long, long way for things like this. It's a technicality that they'll almost certainly let go, so just try to encourage that. If they call you out on it, I dunn…
@jayc1993 said:
i would complete the lessons throughout the curriculum but not do all of the question sets.
after i finish the curriculum i would take timed practice tests and in between doing the practice tests, BR the test but also drill various…
@sweezyseason said:
I think ABC definitely works, as long as you're not leaving out something that must be true or including something that must be false the answer should be correct
Agreed.
@"Stevie C" said:
Whether you read all answer choices or move on is a strategy decision. One consideration is if you usually finish the section within 35 minutes: if not, then you probably can't afford to keep reading answer choices. Another consid…
I'd never thought of the paper. I'm thinking back on my LSATs and actually having trouble remembering what it was like. That suggests to me that it was probably like standard weight printer paper which is what I printed my scantrons onto for PTs. …
@"Alex Divine" said:
I would work my way through the core curriculum again. Take notes and treat it like a part-time job. Do the drills, memorize what JY says, and you will prosper. The course is best designed to be gone through in order.
Yeah, I…
@"Alex Divine" said:
People have suggested three months as the best amount of time one should spend in studying.
I'll just stop you right there... Absolutely false and don't listen to anyone who tells you that.
I think this is really important, …
That doesn't sound too bad. Again, it's technically enough, but it'll be up to your proctor. Maybe call LSAC and see if there's anything that can be done?
Lots of good advice here already, but just to reiterate: Don't waste a take. True, they'll only care about your high score, but wasting a take knowing you're not ready will be a very real detriment to your opportunity to achieve that high score. …
Yeah, it will depend on your proctor. Shoulders are fine, but the chin cut off is technically grounds for denied admissions. How much chin are we talking about here?
Howdy!
Nabokov had synesthesia. I'm trying to imagine the kind of PS he'd've written: Highly disturbing, yet beautiful and compelling. Yeah, I'd be down for that.
Yeah, the LR course is comprehensive- everything you need.
Just watching the curriculum won't be enough though. You've got to drill it into your brain, learn how all the different pieces fit together, and then develop the ability to execute an LR …
Yeah, make sure you have all of those emails at your finger tips when you call. With things like this, the key is to not give up. If the guy that answers the phone can't do it, ask to speak to a supervisor or whatever. If this turns out not to be…
This one is tricky because it's hard to match up your terms. They express the same ideas with very different language and it creates a very challenging argument to follow. If their purpose was to construct a strong, concise argument, we would call…