About 4 months until i was at -1/-0 consistently. Some preptests have harder logic games sections than others, so don't be discouraged if you have a -3 or -4 after so much time while you had some earlier tests that were -0 or -1. The tests are desig…
Hey Duke,
First point i want to make is that its not worth it to get so frustrated by how unrelated the conclusion is to the premises. Every single LSAT argument has a conclusion with a relatively weak connection between premises and conclusion, it…
Game 4 of December 1994 is a truly ancient game, which i really wouldn't worry about too much. I suppose that's what we were saying when we dismissed the circular games, but there was a circular game on preptest 41 which is far more recent than the …
There was one on February 2014, and its the reason i'm taking June. Study them well.
See preptest 41 game 4. I'll post the other notables if i think of them, but i don't believe there are more than 5.
@jeje9999 I bought the ultimate package so i got preptests 36-68. You can purchase the games from preptests 1-35 as a separate package, thereby having access to basically every game ever published.
There are a few tests not included in the above, …
I think 7sage is enough, but i think its important to do the logic games from every single preptest including the ones in the LSAT's they don't provide. They actually provide a supplemental package that includes the games from preptests 1-35 which i…
Principle is sort of a loose word that the LSAT uses for a variety of question types.
MSS principle questions along the lines of the one you cited are not PSA questions. PSA questions are usually (i don't want to say always) indicated by the word '…
JY's extremely (and necessarily) long and informative video provides a complete explanation for why E is correct. Its under the necessary assumption lessons in the main syllabus. If that doesn't do it for you, don't worry too much just yet; do some …
It can come either before or after. Students have confirmed this from disclosed exams in which their first 3 sections were all scored, and with exams in which the experimental came in the first 3. Don't make any assumptions during your actual LSAT o…
If you're going to dish out money for online LSAT software, i'd recommend the following:
Upgrade to the full 7sage package if you haven't done already.
If you think you need more, which i really can't imagine since you have everything you need here,…
I agree. I have read all 3 bibles. The games categorization is unnecessarily complicated and JY teaches everything needed for -0. LR wasn't great either. There's one chapter on percentages that isn't in the 7sage curriculum, but JY explains everythi…
I'd like to add my two cents to this one. When you see "overlooks the possibility" , try to think of it as a weakening question. Its simply raising a possible scenario in which the premises do not support the conclusion as strongly. Try not to think…
JY, the fundamentals are all the same. The skill set you provided us with was more than enough to get a -0 on the game set, INCLUDING the circular game. I studied with 7sage exclusively and only watched one of your circular videos and was able to an…
it just is. i also personally have sabbath observant friends and they've confirmed their LSAT was different than the released preptest. The sabbath one is non-disclosed. Take my word for it.
Go to 'Course' on the top right of the home page (its the second tab from the right) and click on syllabus.Then scroll all the way down to the preptests all of which are designated by number. Click on 'download the PDF and take the test' for the tes…
I am desperate for RC help. 7sage has gotten my LG and LR to near perfect at times but RC is consistently killing my score, i'm averageing -7 wrong per test. I am thinking of ordering Mike Kim's book - can anyone else speak to its effectiveness?