Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DumbHollywoodActor
About
- Username
- DumbHollywoodActor
- Joined
- Visits
- 10,190
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
First, I always do my first instance of a game timed. Sometimes, I solve for each world. Sometimes, I just go off the rules. After, I BR, writing out every world. And after doing that about a hundred times, you’ll start to develop an intuition. (I t…
-
@cverdugo said: Is there anywhere that sells the Superprep 2 on pdf? I think since Superprep 2 came out after LSAC started banning PDF licenses, it’s not a stretch to assume that they didn’t release a PDF version nor will they consider it legal to…
-
@cjones76 @sean.marz @harleywferguson 8pm EST/5pm PST is the starting time for Tuesday (12/1) PT 76.
-
We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative e…
-
I’ll be joining this Group BR tonight. Who’s with me?
-
Raising children. Burying a loved one. NOT finishing a bag of potato chips.
-
@cjones76 Was going to do a special BR session next Tuesday for PT 76. Will that work? And we can do a Monday morning session so that we over all of our bases.
-
Graeme Blake has explanations out for PT 76: http://lsathacks.com/product/lsat-preptest-76-explanations-pdf/
-
Graeme Blake has explanations out for PT 76: http://lsathacks.com/product/lsat-preptest-76-explanations-pdf/
-
@Galapagos.1001 said: But I actually went to a law school info session and a few current law students at my school recommended us TM. That's why I didn't even do any research on other prep courses and just went with it. That’s a classic reasoning…
-
@nicole.hopkins said: he one in Superprep 2 is recent tho! And it’s going to be discussed thoroughly during this Friday’s Group BR. http://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/6121/december-test-br-groups-week-of-nov-23rd-weds-pt74-fri-superp…
-
@tanes256 said: Because it's nondisclosed, or is there some other reason I'm unaware of? Taking the LSAT in February for the first time is not advised because many, if not most, competitive law schools have already filled their rosters for that cy…
-
Sure hope I get to see someone there!
-
@sweetsecret a tentative BR group schedule will be posted within the next week. We've also got some fun new things to add to it. Be on the lookout for that too
-
I’ll be there
-
And if I'm not mistaken the bus/ aisle/window game is in PT 36, right?
-
@nicole.hopkins said: Where my keto peeps at @DumbHollywoodActor I’m here. Egg yolks in avocado, on a bed of spinach drizzled in olive oil and macademia nuts and bacon. Coffee with heavy cream.
-
Hope to see people at the Monday Morning BR Group for PT 54. I’ll be there!
-
Those particular videos (where JY is taking the test in real time) don’t have commentary. But there should be a video explanation (with sound) for each question. If there isn’t, then that needs to be remedied.
-
Nice, dude! Awesome!
-
@sean.marz I promise you. There will be plenty of commiserating over PT 72 tonight on Group BR. We may read the entire UNESCO passage aloud...
-
Actually it is. The comma used with the coordinating conjunction “and” can only be used when it is combining two independent clauses. Admittedly, this is an incredibly bizarre sentence in that the two independent clauses share the same predicate, s…
-
@smg0011 said: In "memorizing those inferences," has the collective body of 7sage knowledge put some kind of quantifiable number on the list of inferences in play. Oh, boy. Sorry. I should have clarified. I didn’t mean to actively memorize inferen…
-
@nicole.hopkins said: Trust me—when you're at 60+ PT's This. I’m at 35 PTs and I can’t even remember ones I took 10 PTs ago never mind PT 36. I find the retakes are about the practice, not about the score.
-
@nicole.hopkins said: And try the BR calls! +1 to this! We have two schedules going right now. http://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/5520/february-test-takers-group-br-schedule-very-tentative and http://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/di…
-
@lschoolgo I’m afraid that’s not true. The “and it is a sophisticated achievement” is in it’s own clause and is not subject to the “one reason” in the independent clause. This disagreement all comes down to the commas that surround “and it is a soph…
-
This is a Must Be False question. Think “Compatible” = “could be true”. Super tricky. I think this is a great example of a style of stimulus that’s thankfully not part of the modern LSAT. For most Must be False q’s, you’re able to chain something to…
-
@Frostbyte said: I'll be there for PT70! That was last week. This week’s discussion thread coming soon...
-
Excellent analysis of the question, which is very tricky. I think the reason why B is correct is that it doesn’t account for the clear decline in cigarette smoking. A good RRE answer will account for both parts of the discrepancy.
-
Sure Winnie! Just click the link to whichever PT group you’d like to participate to on that particular day.