Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DumbHollywoodActor
About
- Username
- DumbHollywoodActor
- Joined
- Visits
- 10,190
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
Yay, Sheri!
-
-
This thread is specifically about M&A work. There are plenty of other avenues to explore that can be financially viable and not make you want to kill yourself. “Litigation” gets thrown around in that thread a bunch of times as a good alternative…
-
@MrSamIam said: That's okay, he's at the right place. If for no other reason than to know that referential phrasing leads to ambiguity.
-
@MrSamIam I’m not even sure what LSAT study course @yangdjusticebound is taking.
-
Your use of referential phrasing makes your statement ambiguous.
-
This right here is why 7sage forum destroys TLS. Bruiser Lives! Kick butt, Brittany!
-
I was thinking more or less the same thing whenI was watching this episode. I even mentioned to my wife that everybody was pretty logic-happy this episode, especially in the Jon-Wildling scene.
-
Nice application of deMorgan's @quinnxzhang . I hadn't thought of that.
-
Yes. The negation of "Some will show up” is not “some will not show up” (what I think you’re implying; I’m not 100% sure). The negation of "Some will show up” is "None will show up” . Remember “some” is a range of 1-100. Its binary cut is None. H…
-
I have nightmares that I’ll have to keep studying for the LSAT for over 18 months. Oh wait- I have studied the LSAT for over 18 months. I also had a dream about a sufficient assumption question that kept moving the gap in its reasoning. Very frust…
-
@twssmith said: For anyone that is similarly finding themselves studying for what seems like an eternity, I have been given a great gift of realizing once again that it can be fun to challenge myself prepping for the test while keeping a balance wi…
-
It’s like getting Force lessons with Yoda.
-
Non-traditional student here. I watch my 4-year old twins (look what happens to children of LSAT addicts: https://twitter.com/Actordavelevine/status/729810600478396417) during the day and tutor SAT/ACT in the evenings and weekends. Somewhere in betw…
-
@guitarnara said: Is skipping 7 questions a normal thing? It all depends how you define “normal”, but if you’re like me, skipping a question (at around the 40 second mark into the question) that you’re not really getting and coming back to it (lik…
-
@MimilaTor said: @DumbHollywoodActor Can you point out that video of a high scorer working on LR questions? I can't find it! https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/preptest-37-preface-to-live-commentary-videos/
-
+1 to everything @"Cant Get Right” said. Also, if you want to see this type of strategy played out in real time, check out the videos accompanying PT 37 in the course syllabus. There’s a video of a high-scoring student working through an LR section.…
-
@BruiserWoods said: watch masters do the thing I would also check out PT37. There’s a great video of a high-scorer going through the test, skipping questions like a crazy person. It’s awesome. https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/preptest-37-preface…
-
Sorry, I didn’t realize I might be disparaging unicorn lovers everywhere. I was using it specifically as someone who scores a 165+ on their diagnostic. “I’m no unicorn!” is something I’ve heard Nicole say a number of times.
-
Nicole Hopkins is the real deal. While she’s a balls-to-the-wall LSAT expert, she’s no unicorn. She has put in the time. She knows the struggle and has overcome it. Most of all, she makes studying for the LSAT fun. You’d be extremely lucky to have h…
-
@"Can’t Get Right" said: MOICHENDISING!! 7Sage the T shirt! 7Sage the coloring book! 7Sage the lunchbox! 7Sage the breakfast cereal! 7Sage the flamethrower! The kids love this one. @"Accounts Playable" said: Argument by analogy: if 7Sage is Space…
-
I’ll keep it simple: Take the Fulbright! You can’t put a price tag on that kind of experience.
-
I think the next statement I said in that comment is telling: "When you get through the logic games portion of the curriculum, you’ll see this super clearly that affirming the necessary condition renders the conditional statement irrelevant.” Even …
-
No. You only BR the ones you circle. By not circling the question, you’re essentially saying you’re 90-100% certain that the answer for that question is correct. In doing so, you’re training your confidence in your test performance. Confidence corre…
-
Relatively speaking, 5 PTs is just a drop in the bucket. I have a few procedural questions. Are you circling questions and only BR-ing those questions or are you BR-ing EVERY question? In other words, is BR score skewed because there aren’t any conf…
-
In case people are wondering what this “Hamilton" is, here’s one of the first live performances of the opening song (7 years ago, actually. Think about that when you’re upset you’ve had to prep for this test for over 6 whole months), in front of no …
-
@twssmith said: so I can hopefully join the BR call tomorrow night. Yay!
-
This works pretty well for me and it didn’t break the bank: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0126JQ9G6?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00
-
@nibs7985 said: but I don't usually get LR questions in 30-50 seconds unless its at the very start of the section. This right here needs to be your first priority when it comes to LR. While it’s nice for the ego to know that you can answer the REA…