Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
ENTJ
About
- Username
- ENTJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,157
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
I took Testmasters (similar to Blueprint). 7sage covers things in a far better way. If you want specifics, pm me.
-
That's amazing! Great job!
-
Great job Rasheed! Good luck to you in law school!
-
I bet you thought of alot of different scenarios similar to that one. It's okay, me too.
-
(I think) JY recommends you read the stem first. So far, I trust his explanations and methodology.
-
What I see all the time is when I go grocery shopping and I pick up some fruit. I"ll think in terms of (inclusive/exclusive) "or" or "and". "If I'm getting banana's, I'm also either getting blueberries or raspberries". "I'm either getting blueberr…
-
Hahahah that's awesome. Technically its a sufficient assumption. If it's an orange from Florida you know it's always delicious. OF-->D
-
I think JY's been teaching us to identify the question stem first to have a better sense of how to approach the stimulus. Which way works for you?
-
I'm still making my way through the 7sage course. But, I'm down. simpaticonx@gmail.com (My name is Al)
-
I think any landmark case will do. You're not really reading for the subject matter per se, but more for its analysis and to condition yourself to read lengthy and complex texts. As for the law review articles, any of the top law schools would be gr…
-
This may seem somewhat radical, but you can start by reading some landmark judicial opinions and dissents to get use to reading dense legal language. I took several pre-law courses during my undergrad and I found such landmark cases and law review a…
-
Torah makes a good point. Your strategy really depends on your timeframe. If you're taking it in February, working through as many RC passages and applying 7sage's RC method may provide more conducive than other reading materials. If you have a year…
-
The name is Al. Good luck with your studies!
-
I believe the answer to both of your questions is yes. If you're getting it right in the BR, that means without the time pressure you're allowing yourself to really look at the problem and solve it correctly. As other 7sagers have said, usually you …
-
Haha. Good one. I believe that would be construed as a bi-conditional statement if you entered the indicators: "If and only if" or "If but only if".
-
Thanks Candice!
-
Working off what Torah said, you have to look at the different dynamics of the stimulus. For example, argument part questions are notorious for having competing conclusions. You could have a conclusion come right after the turn (but, however, etc) a…
-
Study buddy for the Feb Lsat; San Francisco