@splitterhopeful You have to understand what you've been able to accomplish with 5 PT's is quite impressive. To get to your level of expectation, it's simply gonna take more time to really acclimate yourself to the nuances of the LSAT. It's all heur…
Check out this specific NA question. It's a great question and a great explanation by JY.
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-24/
@petitigre Just three. And I'm not really a full ENTJ. My extroversion and introversion are just about balanced. I used to be a lot more extroverted when I was younger.
You're suppose to do it with any game that you're confused about. If you want to take the scrutiny higher and aim for a 170+ score, timing is also a big factor when applying the fool-proof method. Usually JY gives you an estimated time how long a ga…
@gs556 That's a great example. I especially like your sucker choice in there. People would negate (B) and think...well you have to win the majority of votes in a national election. But not so! The stim talks about the republican primary and not the …
@eastring I think the PT's are out to get you. Kidding! I second Nicole's advice. Read Jonathan Wang's (JW?) post. JY and JW! Am I the first to see this?!