Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
ExcludedMiddle
About
- Username
- ExcludedMiddle
- Joined
- Visits
- 978
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@MissChanandler said: Powerscore usually does predictions on what will be on future LSAT's and they're relatively accurate (at the end of the day it's always a guess, but they make VERY educated guesses and have analyzed all of the trends and …
-
You want to get it in before your LSAT score comes in - ideally at least 10-14 days before it's released. That way, everything else is in and you're otherwise complete once the score is released. If you wait until you get the score to submit then it…
-
I think you're going to have to take a leap of faith either way. You have no way of knowing how you'd do at either tier.
-
Frankly, most people say that Kaplan sucks for the LSAT. So most of your prep to this point has been done with a company with awful reviews for its LSAT content (Kaplan is pretty good for just about every other standardized test). Just given that fa…
-
@Ohnoeshalpme Unfortunately I will not be able to pay for a tutor. As far as RC goes, one factor is that in previous preps my focus has mostly been LR and LG. The overall amount of time devoted total to RC was pretty minimal compared to LG especiall…
-
Part of this is building your intuition for this sort of statement. "People cannot be morally responsible for things over which they have no control." I'm assuming that that's the original statement from the question. Intuitively I would just transl…
-
The CC on here is all "digital," and the logic underlying the test will be the same, so I don't think it'll be a huge adjustment. The weird part, I think, will be switching to doing LG on scratch paper. Since scores will presumably be released a lot…
-
Sure. I'll give it a look.
-
Make sure you are practicing timed. If you drill LR, do it with a timer and only give yourself 80-90 seconds per problem at most. If you do LG, time the games with a stopwatch and try to get to the point where you're doing them in the time JY/7Sage …
-
Last cycle was really competitive and had more apps, so I think the later tests were regarded as being too late. That shouldn't necessarily be true of this cycle, based on what the admissions people are saying. I don't think it'd be "quite late" at …
-
@"Victoria." said: I agree with @"Beast Mode" i did all of the LG sections 60-83 before sept then redid them all before november and I remembered way less than I thought I would. Once you do so many games they start to blur (except the really …
-
Yeah, I think I read that they can come out as late as 8-9 pm.
-
Pleased with my score! Especially for how test day went for me personally. I will be retaking, but it's something to build on for sure. I hope everyone else did well.
-
@Chardiggity said: I did one point worse than September, which I was NOT expecting. Pretty crushed. I was thinking about delaying a cycle, but someone I talked to said clearly my two scores are consistent with who I am as an LSAT taker. I feel…
-
Good luck to all! Hopefully the curve will be generous.
-
I'd avoid asking that. They will probably wonder if you don't trust them, which could damage your relationship if you ever happen to run into them in the future. Also, if they really were enthusiastically praising you in their letter, it's somewhat …
-
Assuming they haven't uploaded their letters yet, delete them as recommenders and then re-add them to your account (you may have to email them a link to invite them to uploaded their letter again too), but remember to check yes to waiving your right…
-
The equivalent of the foolproof method for LR is what JY calls blind review, in my opinion. Check out the lessons on it in the CC.
-
I liked today's RC even though I was tired and slow in it. I got stuck on some questions in the one about films. The topics were all interesting, though. I'm familiar with some of the Big Bang views already, so when I got to that passage I was mad t…
-
@MorganDobersek said: Mine was LR, RC, LR, LR, LG Im thinking the second LR was experimental (it seemed so much harder). What do you guys think??? I had the same order and also felt that the second LR was the hardest one. I didn't fini…
-
@tbrit011 said: @ExcludedMiddle said: Anyone who had experimental LR and has determined which section it was, was it the second LR? The middle one with the most questions seems to be the experimental Good.
-
Anyone who had experimental LR and has determined which section it was, was it the second LR?
-
There are numerous things to which you could be referring. If you're referring to the fallacy whereby one reasons that just because something could happen, it will happen, you would probably call it an appeal to possibility. Even if something is re…
-
@"Wavey Boi" said: @BinghamtonDave said: @ChaimtheGreat I've been guessing the same thing, based on not much more than the old intuition. Mapping-like logic game. Example of a mapping logic game??? PT 4 Game 4, PT 6 Game…
-
Those are some bold predictions. Some other company said we'll probably have grouping and sequencing games. I was like, "Really?? No way!" (;
-
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/16887/pt-84-score-went-down
-
Definitely take it. You're within striking distance of your goal score. With January as a backup test, you should be fine.
-
This is really my weak area too. I'm around -3 or -4 in LR sections, but RC and pure grouping games are what's currently holding me back from 167+. I'm going to drill pure grouping games and RC passages this final week in hopes that it'll get me to …
-
Identify your most inconsistent area and drill that as hard as you can the next two weeks.
-
People who say the "easiest to improve" thing are exaggerating a bit. LG is probably the most learnable section, but for many people, it takes a lot of repetition and time to get good at the section. Just try to stay positive and keep churning away …