Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
ExcludedMiddle
About
- Username
- ExcludedMiddle
- Joined
- Visits
- 978
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I believe the first two would translate into conditional logic as A --> B. The last two are the reverse: B --> A. The phrases used should signal to you that there's a conditional relationship between A and B in each example. The phrases use…
-
I agree with btate87's advice. I'll add that the older preptests are definitely still helpful for drilling RC, in my opinion. I think it may even be a good way to add endurance since the comparative reading passages are, at least to me, less taxing …
-
It's not just law students. I read an interesting article about a guy who worked in a Big Law-type environment in the NY Times several months ago. He was addicted to drugs and I'd guess that he almost certainly suffered from some sort of anxiety or …
-
I was actually getting mad before I read the article lol.
-
If you're looking to make big money easily, law probably isn't the best career to pursue. You will work long, hard hours and sacrifice a lot for the money you make, especially in Big Law. Also, most people won't make partner, so hoping for those luc…
-
How was your experience with the Feb LSAT? Does it being undisclosed affect your prep for June at all? It really hasn't because I know which section was my weakest in February (LG), and so I am certain that that's the section in which I need to…
-
I'm currently planning to retake it in June (I took the February 2018 LSAT), but I'd be open to switching to July if I felt the extra time would be beneficial. Taking an undisclosed test doesn't seem so bad if you know you're as ready as you could p…
-
I had the exact same thing happen to me. I'm confident that I missed at least 10 in that LG section, but I could've easily missed 15+ questions. I wish they could tell us how many we missed in each section. I will be focusing on LG for June.
-
@"mickey.caleb" said: There are some LG materials in the Starter package. Really though, LG has basic diagramming that can be done in numerous ways for each game. Using 7sage and free resources, I saw a few ways people organized their games an…
-
It makes me feel a bit better to know that a lot of you found that LG section pretty tough. I would love to have a copy of that section so I could redo/review the games. I guess that's the risk you take with the February test, though. If you don't a…
-
@"mickey.caleb" said: I scored a 164 in Dec. and a 172 in Feb. Not exactly the easiest 8 points to gain and I did it with the starter course. The core curriculum with JY's vids is by far the most valuable portion of 7sage materials, in my opin…
-
I thought the LG section was pretty tough. Granted I hadn't slept much and probably had some test day jitters affecting me, but I think at least two of the games were hard. It seemed like every game had some sort of twist to it, even if only a minor…
-
Thing is, you took it and schools will know that you did either way. So if you cancel, while you won't have a score on your record, they'll know you sat for it and you may need an excuse for cancelling it. Does a cancelled score look that much bette…
-
I’d say unless you made a major mistake, sounds like you’ll be fine. I felt like LG on the Feb test was so generous. I had two LG sections and there was only 1 substitution q—unlike Dec. The games were simple in structure. They added twists and t…
-
Don't know if I'm "crushing it," but I feel I've made a good amount of progress lately. I used to miss 7-11 questions regularly per section. But ever since I started to stick to a strategy that's sort of a blend of the Memory Method and the LSAT Tra…
-
Do/foolproof as many games as you can handle through next Thursday. I agree with the advice that you should go lighter on practice tests, given how little time is left. If you can identify some definite problem areas in LR, you might drill 5-10 ques…
-
-Make sure to "take stock of what's left," as JY says repeatedly, when you're doing in/out games. Sometimes there are important numbers-related inferences to be made, and it seems the LSAT likes to test that. -Always put a dual option in the "out" …