Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
FixedDice
About
- Username
- FixedDice
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,065
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@GrumpySnail said: So what would you guys recommend me to do? Should I ED NW with a 168+ LSAT? a 170+? or even a 173+? How about deliberating all this after you have an actual score (or a considerable number of timed PT practices)? With all …
-
Just realized I need to clarify my explanation... @nathanieljschwartz said: older children who slept with night lights as infants and still suffer from nearsightedness You are making an unwarranted assumption. (E) only says said children wh…
-
As far as I know: Availability of application depends on each school. You see the essay prompts for a school when its application becomes accessible. They change very rarely though. By the end of December.
-
The problem with (E) is not that it discusses statistical anomalies - it is just irrelevant. (E) is irrelevant because the cause of nearsightedness in said children is unknown. For all we know, their nearsightedness could have been caused by anythi…
-
@LSATcantwin said: empiredidnothingwrong 2k18galacticpropaganda 2k18imperialpropaganda
-
@westcoastbestcoast said: Yes the final duel between Obi-Wan and Maul was exceptionally good. Not flashy so casual fans may not like it, but the complexity was there. Obi Wan switching his fighting stance from Qui Gonn's to his own in order to…
-
Speaking of the Emperor, the lightsaber duel between Darth Sidious and the Maul brothers is awesome. So is the final duel between Obi-Wan Kenobi and Darth Maul.
-
F) The OP, who misspelled the Emperor's Sith name.
-
As far as my knowledge is concerned: No regarding majors. You can still give a shot. Why not? It does look good, but I do not know whether it will entirely compensate for low UGPA. I would think your GPA is acceptable though. I believe graduate sc…
-
@10000019 said: Speak for yourself. I'm going to law school to better understand, Law and Order. I don't know... Are you sure forensic science or law enforcement isn't your calling?
-
UoM's employment statistics notwithstanding, legal market has been and will be saturated. Each year about 230 accredited AND unaccredited law schools produce thousands of graduates. (Hopefully) each graduate would fill a specialized role which would…
-
Didn't all those environmental passages and stimuli make you more environmentally conscious? Shame on you!
-
@wenjuan_xu said: Exactly what I thought. Which "average" PT would you recommend? I unfortunately do not have difficulty levels of individual PTs in my head. PTs 52-61 perhaps? I agree with @LindsMitch, by the way.
-
Compared to other PTs with comparative passages, I am inclined to think that it is on the easier side.
-
Try solving PTs untimed for a month or two. Since you said you have about six minutes left yet get 8-10 questions wrong on each section, it sounds like you are not deliberating your answer choices enough.
-
No. You cannot make a valid deduction from "G -m--> F -m-> C." It is possible, but it is not valid (i.e. 100% true). See "Invalid Argument Form (6 of 7)" under "Invalid Argument Forms."
-
No free comprehensive list, as far as my knowledge is concerned. 7Sage has good ol' Question Bank, which lists all questions (not just LR, but RC and AR as well) by type, and Drill Packs, which categorize all LR questions by type. Both are available…
-
Torts: This class seems to present all sorts of the darnedest situations. Criminal Law: Sat in a lecture; sounded quite interesting. Constitutional Law: I'm thinking 90% of all law school applicants will list this class as #1. I choose to be a part…
-
@LSATlife said: Y is described as something that warrants X. Warrant means sufficient so I thought it also means Y---> X. I believe "warrant" is geared more toward necessity rather than sufficiency. So per your logic it would mean X -&…
-
Are you sure you entered the right PT # and such? PT 25, S3, Q7 is an Analytic Reasoning question that doesn't seem to have a "warranted... only" phrase. Context notwithstanding, I think you are partially right. "X can be warranted only by Y" would…
-
Definitely include those. I believe some schools actually ask applicants to list undergraduate activities in their resumes.
-
Yes. Chances are it will be a quite bad decision. There is no guarantee you will get the score you want even if you study for a whole year. Most respectable law schools will want to see an addendum for a gap year. My hunch is that admission comitt…
-
(1) I am more than ready to bet on the possibility that there would be at least one person who would sue or otherwise harass the test center or the LSAC for his or her lost cell phone; (2) mere storage is not the issue - for instance, I can picture…
-
Don't think so.
-
Have you tried taking a short nap (5-10 minutes) after coming back from work? Sounds like your brain and body can use some recuperation.
-
I have two Ws on my transcript. No effect whatsoever on my GPA. You should be fine.
-
Better safe than sorry, no?
-
@"Cant Get Right" said: Roman Law: I studied Latin and Roman History/Culture, so this was an easy interest. What I really found so intriguing though was the different concepts of law. I think maybe it's Chicago that has a class on Roman Law, a…
-
@beezmoof said: The title of this post is actually a really nice reminder. Thanks Tells me to see if I can enjoy what I'm reading when doing the exams. This is one of the reasons I started this discussion. RC is my least favorite section, s…
-
Every time I see or read something predicting what will occur in the future, my brain reminds me of the hoverboard.