Contra: /ID →/UR→/EW
/PC→/EW
Answer choices:
D) /EW→PC. contra: /PC→EW. Not sure how it is that this CBT. In the stim, /PC --> /EW.
The second part in D the contra form is not (/PC --> EW) but first CBT.
You have it correct C…
Like everyone else said above, definitely not an indicator of any kind for ACs. Completely situation dependant. To give a counter example, I feel much better with weak wording like "some" for testing the 'correct' AC for NA.
Thank you guys so much, I honestly thought it was an accident when I saw it in my email..but love the new system!
Thank you @akistotle love seeing the lessons you linked to folks under CC, you know the CC inside and out.
Congrats man your hard work paid off!! Now go celebrate!
Sorry for being late btw, I'm currently travelling abroad so probably will be late for everything for another 3 weeks lol
Before the age of 10, I had always "wanted" to become a scientist when I grow up to contribute to and "protect" my country (China at that time and how silly) Entering the age of rebellion (teenage years) I was one of those trouble kids who constantl…
Well, I did finish all problem sets during my CC phase, but I certainly didn't finish them all in one setting. My brain would be jammed after a certain point so I had to do some LG and reading to chop them up. I did return the next day continue wher…
It varies depending on the individual and the number of problem sets one incorporates in the process. Some advocate doing all sets, some intentionally save them for later drilling, and of course, there are also folks in between. There is really no r…
I don't necessarily think the word itself is too big/Small, complex/simple, cuz that's kinda subjective as we can see. But it does seem rather controversial -- just the fact that it's causing a debate. So when we use a word in such a nature, we are …
I really like David's emphasis test, that's what I do for the first line of attack. I only use factual accuracy as a secondary approach (it's time consuming); I try to find the emphasis first eliminate all the ones just off the point (hence I don't …
@"Seeking Perfection"
I believe our disagreement is whether or not I advocate for lower ranking schools, and I think my post is self-explanatory.
Previously, You've expressed no opinion on what constitutes as the necessary condition for success an…
@"Seeking Perfection"
Here is the conclusion of my original comment:
"Generally, I do believe T14 would make a difference, but it certainly isn't the end of the world if it's not. I believe we should all just do our best studying for the test and …
@"Seeking Perfection" well, I believe at this point this discussion has many layers and you and I seem to have a different focus, which is fine.
@"Seeking Perfection" said:
No one is arguing that the people at non Top 14 or top whatever sch…
@DatguyM15 said:
"You can't go to Loyola New Orleans law school and graduate with a 2.5 and expect to run to the top of the ladder. You have to find a way to achieve at your highest level and get noticed.
If you work hard and continue t…
@"samantha.ashley92" so jealous haha. I'm a city boy but I'm sure I'll miss the south later down the road looking back. It's a fun place and I like southern cooking, well, some of it lol
@uhinberg said:
Because it's an awesome job -- good pay, and not too much responsibility; prestige and work-life balance.
Ah that makes sense, and it's kinda a life long job security too once hired. I thought about it but I thought there w…
@"samantha.ashley92"
I agree with Vanderbilt, it's actually a great school about 40 mins away from where I live. I actually totally would if it wasn't for just wanna get out of TN..lol
@TheMikey
I've heard about too with legal academia and I wo…
Great examples above with important figures went to a relatively less known/ranked school. I'd also add Megyn Kelly to the list (not her fan tho lol) those are for sure examples/proof that top ranked law schools aren't necessarily the necessary cond…
Oh and the argument def doesn't have to be valid, it could be a crapy argument, we just need to find the NA. All "arguments" (valid or crappy) have assumptions, at least on the LSAT.
From my personal experience, I found it to be crucial to separate out the argument structure, namely premise and conclusion. The necessary assumption has be embedded in the relationship between the two. Don't be distracted by the context cuz that's …
You are definitely not alone, it takes lots of ppl forever (especially me lol) so don't be discouraged. Like lsatcantwin said above, the strategy and process for studying could vary according to the individual, so I can only speak for myself in that…
Hey Graeme, while 7sage is still my main prep resource, I do feel like I need to clarify my previous post a bit. On the "out of scope" note, I actually wasn't referring to your site, I was first "agreeing" with some stipulation about those AC explan…
@"Alex Divine" said:
@"Heart Shaped Box" said:
I think they need to adjust the LSAT difficulty level comparable to that of GRE, if the latter is gonna be widely accepted which seems to be the trend. Otherwise I have a hard time see…
I think they need to adjust the LSAT difficulty level comparable to that of GRE, if the latter is gonna be widely accepted which seems to be the trend. Otherwise I have a hard time seeing how the LSAT would/could persist.
I believe it's under extential quantifers some and most relationships titled as "how to negate statements in English".
I tried posting the link on here but I'm on my cell phone App so I couldn't figure it out how to do it, but please let us know if…