Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Heart Shaped Box
About
- Username
- Heart Shaped Box
- Joined
- Visits
- 6,652
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, ⭐
Comments
-
Thank you guys for such an honor, I won't take it lightly.
-
Gotcha, I see what you are saying now. But yeah, I agree with @jknauf , do them all, especially at the beginning!
-
I would say yes. Inferences really come from questions. I think what he meant is if there are any games (from which inferences come) give you any trouble at all, print out 10 clean copies or whatever it takes until you completely master the games/qu…
-
I wouldn't go as far as saying having/using supplemental materials is a "bad" idea, cuz it's somewhat subjective in my opinion, largely depending on the individual. I've seen ppl benefit from this approach, but I've also heard many folks get confuse…
-
I third that too, great advice Alex!
-
Doing PTs is a way of simulating the real test conditions by taking the "full exam" proctored and timed just like the test day, whereas drilling is the approach to address certain weaknesses after PTs' results have revealed them. Let's say you finis…
-
Supreme court oral argument audio is pretty good for critical thinking exercise: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_audio.aspx I would also recommend Sam Harris' (one of my favorite authors) Podcast or any intellectual debate/di…
-
Yes, it depends on the question stem. In that question, they are asking which one is a complete and accurate list of the buildings F could serve, which is either X, Y, or else Y, Z. Bc there are 2 complete and accurate lists of the buildings in whic…
-
Thanks so much again Josh for sharing your experience, was helpful as always!
-
I don't think it does, at least not a conditional one. Because an universal quantifier/conditional logic dictates a logical relationship between the sufficient and necessary condition. Its a relationship of a complete subsumption. The sufficiency "i…
-
I haven't officially started PTing yet so I'm not in a position to give concrete advise. But it seems the general consensus from those sages for ppl like us who just finished CC is that no more than 2 PTs a week at the beginning. (1 per week sugg…
-
I think it depends on the difficulty of the game. Personally speaking, I would do 3 or 4 games per day for easier one, but only 1 or 2 a day for the hard ones. To me, the key is to achieve understanding during fool-proofing period, as opposed to qua…
-
Hello I think you might have misread the rule 5 P is not on the same team as Q as part of the "Neither K nor P is on the same team as N" rule. Neither K nor P is on the same team as N is translated as: P and K independently --->N. P is not on …
-
I don't remember all the details on this game but from what you wrote, I think you would just put L out, since P in L is out, P out L is also out, then might as well just put L out, and when necessary satisfied, rule goes away, which would free up P…
-
@"Cant Get Right" She needs Phase 2 Josh!! #Goldenadvise!
-
I appreciate it man, thanks for confirming! This has truly helped!
-
I agree with the reversal sufficiency/necessity confusion, but I guess I didn't word my question clear. I guess I was asking why "other than" in this case wouldn't trigger W to be the sufficient condition, like why is wrong to say "if it's a whale, …
-
I agree @"Alex Divine" those "out of scope" explanations from other sites truly pisses me off. I was like, are you fu$king kidding me? I KNOW it's out of the scope, but HOW?? lol I didn't really get into LSAT Hacks, if have to pick a secondary sourc…
-
lol my bad. Like why is it wrong to to say if W ---> then /M, since this is not the correct contrapositive form of the answer /W ---> M. Is it bc "other than" blah blah what i said above lol
-
So helpful @"Cant Get Right"! @"Cant Get Right" said: "What is the thing that is required?" The answer to this question is the thing which is the necessary condition. I wish they would have added this in the book, clears things up MUCH better! …
-
I'm Asian (I think..?) lol but I was horrible at games. I still wouldn't claim I am good at them now, but a lot better than before. Though I do think having a mathematical/engineering background would help. My totally white buddy (non-Asian) who has…
-
Thanks so much for this review. I currently live in Murfreesboro, TN was gonna register here at MTSU (no idea about the facilities), since it's literally a 5 mins drive. But I now seems to have one more option. The only trade-off for me it's the dri…
-
I agree with everyone above completely, the repeating nature of the rule is def a big indicator in sensing a chart as the setup. Time and time again, they often combine this repeating rule nature (at least) with "Not-both" rules to restrict certain …
-
@"Cant Get Right" 's don't waste a take advice is and should be the only criteria anyone who takes their score seriously goes by, though I understand the "testing-water" proposition, it simply does not apply in this case. I've been postponing since …
-
Who is this women, she is a Harvard professor or something?
-
@"Dillon A. Wright" But i'm pretty sure that was years ago when he got in Harvard. He probably will be able to score a 183 now.
-
@BruiserWoods It's honestly a good score, a very good score. But I understand and am confident you'll get it for sure on the next administration. "A master has failed more times than a beginner has even tried" This is the quote I print out on my des…
-
Congrats man! I knew it!