Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
J.Y. Ping
About
- Username
- J.Y. Ping
- Joined
- Visits
- 6,510
- Last Active
- Roles
- Administrator, Instructor
Comments
-
Update: Study Group Leader role changed to ⏰ This change is to better reflect the organizational role played by ⏰ members. ⏰ members are those who have access to 7Sage's GTM account and can schedule BR calls.
-
@akistotle thanks for tagging! It's been updated now.
-
Ah good question! The answer is to be found in lines 9 - 14 "some of these Social Darwinist theorists held that..." and lines 14 - 20 "Another, more activist group of Social Darwinists held that..." That's the controversy. Next paragraph: "Gilman …
-
To Kill a Mockingbird or My Cousin Vinny
-
@EvetteCee Good! I'll talk more about (D). From the information in the stimulus, we can loosely infer that Demosthenes was not reading aloud from the tablet / was just reading very quietly or silently to himself. This follows from the description o…
-
@10000019 Good response! And since I agree, I'll just reiterate the points you already made. This is an inference question, not a what was stated question so if you go hunting for the text, you won't find it. You will, however, find text that suppo…
-
@"Cant Get Right" said: I have two primary considerations in deciding to split: Will the other rules apply pressure on the split game boards? Basically, will the split game boards create useful restrictions that will allow me to u…
-
@"J.Y. Ping" said: I do not recall seeing a correct answer on the LSAT trade on your being able to distinguish a strong v. a weak "until" or "unless". As far as I recall, if you interpret until as weak, you do not get penalized, even if the …
-
This is super interesting. I did not get into this in the CC but I should have. When I update the CC in the year 2030 I will include it. The short answer is that there are two versions of "until" and "unless", a strong one and a weak one. On the LS…
-
@"Leah M B" Good response! @ayannaabrownn Think about it this way, suppose it was said that (1) Caligula poisoned his grandmother; (2) forced a father to watch his son be executed and then make fun of the execution at a celebration; and (3) fed c…
-
@10000019 Good response! @"K 440244" Think about the assumption the argument is making. Premises say that (1) the majority party supported the bill which recently passed; and (2) polls predict they'll lose a dozen seats in the next election. Are we…
-
A sensible critique @anonclsstudent. And I promise you're not alone here. You're simply saying something out loud that lots of other students are wondering too. I agree with your main point: strategies ought to be predictive, not retrospective. I t…
-
Recorded this AMA will be.
-
Yup, go ahead!
-
@doyouevenLSAT @lsatplaylist @skiatook89 @"jh.lee_jenny" If you guys missed this, you can listen to it here:
-
@DAVIDJ5566 Did it work?
-
Yup, it's what @akistotle said. I should have used a different item to illustrate the point. Now that I'm looking at this game again, I wonder if a chart would have been a better setup to use.
-
@akistotle That's right. I don't have anything to add.
-
@lsat2016 Congrats! Here's a recent thread on a similar topic: https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13838/is-getting-an-interview-at-harvard-law-a-good-sign Could you please post your request / question / comment there? Gobble gobbl…
-
This is all true.