@montahar thanks for replying! A small correction - the actual webinar itself will NOT be uploaded. However, the content of the presentation will be available in the Admissions courses (all levels).
Hey @hmccabe1214 assuming there's enough space (we're capped at 100), anyone interested is welcome and encouraged to join. If we have to prioritize for space, then priority goes to paid members. I'm guessing we're not going to hit 100 so I think you…
Sure, time limits are applied to your entire account. So if you purchased LSAT U+ you get 18 months. If you purchase Admissions U+ on top of that, you get 4 months. In total, you'll have access to everything for 22 months.
You can see how much tim…
@syed.216 LR explanations for 18-77 are complete and currently available. LR explanations for 1-17 are incomplete. In other words, only some are currently available. I do plan to make the rest of them, but they are super low priority so they won't b…
Hey, there's a thread on the front page right now that's very similar to yours.
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/7670/lors-for-old-people
Please continue the conversation there, thanks!
@"The 180 Bro_OVO" thanks for vouching! David Busis's Admissions and Essay Writing course really is amazing. Everyone on 7Sage should pick it up. https://classic.7sage.com/enroll-admissions/
I should have been clearer in the original lesson from which this question arose.
The reason why it's confusing is because in English, you get to use the same predicate for more than one subject. "Alan goes to the park." That's one subject (Alan) …
@"Accounts Playable" Great explanation and thanks!
@benjipants I like your notation. N/(R/S) is more accurate. But doesn't it still leave out the same possibility? Like for example, if R is the item that's out. That seems to satisfy the notation. …
@"Cant Get Right" just out of curiosity we ran the numbers using only PTs 58 - current
All questions
A 388 19.3%
B 443 22.0%
C 409 20.3%
D 396 19.7%
E 379 18.8%
Total 2015
Last five questions (of each section)
A 81 16.88%
B 114 23.75%
C 92 19.17…
There's no way to do this directly. (For any Ultimate+ users reading this, the best proxy is to go to the questions bank, filter for flaw / descriptive weakening questions, then eye ball through the questions. This is a decent proxy.)
For Premium u…
@jjfheintz said:
the concept of "logical equivalence" was the assumption that I was missing, which led me to learning to test it via a truth table.
And this is why 7Sage teaches the LSAT better. Which book are you using?
This reads like an LR stimulus to me.
(3) Autism epidemic. Enormous effort has been expended to uncover the sources of the “autism epidemic” (e.g., King, 2011), the supposed massive increase in the incidence and prevalence of autism, now termed au…
Yeah, it's both - for example, in "(1) A gene for" you get the MC, then supporting examples. That's LSAT structure. You also get substantive knowledge, which is great. By the way, make good use of the dictionary when reading this. I looked up "polym…