Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Jordan Johnson
About
- Username
- Jordan Johnson
- Joined
- Visits
- 353
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, ⭐
Comments
-
@NoobMaster69 I jumped around the three major categories with no issue, but went through each video lecture in order. You're prone to "slip" on something you've previously focused on and put on the back-burner. It happens to all of us, regardless o…
-
@lovegamemakeslifefun What information do you consider out of scope about A? And why do you consider D to be in scope?
-
Hi @"jeremy.pimenta", As someone who took the GMAT during undergrad (I've now completed my MBA) and just took the LSAT this past weekend, I can say that the approach you're suggesting worked well for me. I used Manhattan Prep's GMAT course as my in…
-
@BigJay20 Sure. I took the test last Sunday and everything went smoothly with ProctorU. They did ask me to rotate my desk to show the doorway to my bedroom -- to ensure that nobody walks in or out during the exam -- and I complied. One of my Study…
-
@Christopherr Agreed. They've adapted a lot of questions and passages (when they switched from paper to digital) so that a Cmd+F would be unreliable and possibly even detrimental depending on your understanding of a passage... Proceed with caution.
-
After you've finished BR and gotten your results for a Problem Set, you should see a link for "Explanation" in the right-most column. That should bring you to a video for that specific question. Alternatively, you can go to Problem Sets --> Expl…
-
I really like The Loophole's approach to LR. I had already used PowerScore LR book as a resource (in addition to 7Sage), although I didn't go through it chapter-by-chapter like I did with The Loophole. Ellen used to be a top tutor at PowerScore, so…
-
If you're short on time, I'd suggest doing Camo Review (http://elementalprep.com/camo) and then reviewing questions it spits back at you (some of them will be 'decoys' that you actually got correct the first time) and questions that you flagged only…
-
The CC estimated times are relatively exaggerated; if you're already familiar with a concept, you'll get through that section must faster than the estimated time. I'd suggest not skipping around the CC within an overall test-section category (e.g. …
-
Games in the section individually, one-by-one.
-
@Constantine It seems like two LR sections would be good to review since the people taking the August test will have to take 4 sections if I understand correctly. Or maybe just adding a random 4th section from some other test to get the same stamina…
-
I'm with Daniel/@canihazJD on this one. Before I had a Study Group to go through each question with, I used a combo of reviewing my flagged questions and Ellen's 'Camo Review' (https://elementalprep.com/camo) to determine what I'd go over before sub…
-
@"tkappen.neppak" I used CAMO Review early on [before I became part of a study group] to figure out what I needed to focus on the most (if I chose something wrong the first time on a certain question type, but fixed it on a second attempt, it was a …
-
@LSATIndia said: @"Jordan Johnson" said: You sure can: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-flex-score-converter/ Can this be used if we do only three sections on LawHub? I don't see why not. You're just inputting your raw 'inc…
-
@Constantine said: @"Jordan Johnson" said: Depends on how Sunday's test goes, but following JIC Good luck! Thank you sir!
-
Where do you want to ultimately practice law? From what I understand: (a) law schools tend to teach, generally, the law in the context of that specific state; and (b) the Bar is specific to each state, and you have to take the Bar in each state that…
-
Underline both conclusions you recognize (one has to be a subconclusion, the other has to be the overall conclusion). Determine which one is supporting the other. An overall conclusion won't offer support/evidence for a subconclusion, but a subconcl…
-
Depends on how Sunday's test goes, but following JIC
-
Those examples both seem like definitions, so I wouldn't use conditional notation on either of them (they're both saying 'A is B'... I don't see the term 'whatever' as a logical indicator). I suppose a bi-conditional would make the most sense since…
-
You can use five pieces of scratch paper (front-and-back) for the test. That -- and a combination of their annotation tools -- has to be used as a substitute.
-
[Daniel covered it more succinctly above]
-
You sure can: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-flex-score-converter/
-
The contrapositive of P --> I is /I --> /P (you have an illegal negation in your explanation). Assuming this is PT 13's second LR section, Q 14, choice E is correct because we don't know anything about "irritating" cats -- "irritating" doesn'…
-
They don't have a "Simulate Flex" option, you'd just have to submit one of the LR sections without completing it to get a score report.
-
@swanganie Looking forward to it.
-
@canihazJD Looking forward to M20 on Wednesday and then whichever 60s-range test(s) after that.
-
If you take all 4 sections, you can always use the '7Sage Flex Score Converter' to estimate of how you would have done if it had it been a Flex version of that test: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-flex-score-converter/ The opposite is not true, and…
-
The rules are about the ordering of the students (G and P are consecutive; I and R are consecutive; etc). Generally when the rules are specifying ordering for a specific set of variables, its the other set you want to use as the board itself (in thi…
-
The best advice I've gotten for those types of questions is to look for specific evidence in the passage regarding what the author would think. Before I started doing that, I'd just try to 'put myself in the author's shoes' and imagine what they'd t…