I agree. I also think that it is different for RC. I think it is worth it to read all of the answer choices there regardless because you are faster, more accurate and more confident that way. But for LR and LG, the 80% or 90% certainty should work, …
I don't think that you should be diagramming each question...that takes way too long. Granted, some questions require you to diagram and some don't. I would recommend using your original diagram, create boards as you see fit, and try to visualize ho…
@akistotle said:
In the LSAT world, I think the default reading is inclusive (unless it is explicitly stated that it's "not both").
I agree with this. I think that inclusive is the way to go, but like @jkatz1488 mentioned, it really depends …
Hi!
You can but I don't. I agree that it is a pain and is a redundant process to input things twice. Plus, it is not like you are changing your BR score if you have the same exact answer. So I don't think it is necessary.
Hope this helps!
Hi there!
I think whatever the target time is for each game, you should be at least one minute under it. Bubbling included. The reason for this is because you will get faster when you push yourself to make inferences more efficiently. The LG portio…
If you are not consistently -0 in games, I would say it is definitely worth going through it. Even if you are, it still may be worth it because you will identify any weaknesses that you may have.
In other words, yes it worth going through at least …
This is still going on?! Y'all are crazy...it's a pencil! But to each their own I guess...We all need a weapon that we feel will allow us to be triumphant in battle
Hi again! Sorry for the delay!
I think your approach to this question kind of gets to the core of the problem. To me, after my first read, I really don't think this is that bad of an argument. But I don't see it as correlation/causation. I don't tr…
Hi!
So I think the answer to your first question is that it depends. Some situations parallel directly to the lessons and others don't. This is why we want to understand the underlying philosophy of the lessons but not take them too literally. We w…
Hi!
I think it is because you took the test in February. Fee waivers usually start to come in around July. Where you will have already taken the test, you will be in a better position to receive them than someone taking the test in September or Dec…
All I wanna know is what do I gotta do to have the same luck and turn around as those you know...
JK. But I agree not to rush the process. Similar to some, this process has taken me way longer than I would like to admit and may even be pushing back…
I forgot to add them! Here they are!
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/10749/my-rc-strategy-that-got-me-to-0
https://classic.7sage.com/webinar/davids-six-tips-on-doing-it-right/
As David mentions, read the comments under the passa…
Hi!
I kind of disagree with Manhattan. I don’t think this is a valid argument, and surprisingly that is okay here. Our job is to parallel the reasoning. It doesn’t matter whether that reasoning is valid or not because it is not specified; we just h…
Hi there!
As @jkatz1488 mentioned, congrats on your improvements! It seems as though RC is an issue for you and that is okay! I would definitely advocate you to check out some of the work by @"Accounts Playable" and @TheoryandPractice. I will provi…
I agree with @imharris. I would also add that, regardless of how much you "enjoy" it, BR is incredibly important. You may not enjoy and that is okay. But I sure enjoy getting better at this test. Just knowing this is immensely helpful in my improve…
Hi!
This is a great question. I feel like we can learn a lot from this question because it is incredibly abstract. Anyways…here is my explanation.
Let’s start with the basics. What is the fundamental purpose of this statement? It is a premise for …
This is an interesting perspective! I think this is inherently what we do when we weaken arguments, just not in an explicit sense. For example, when we read the stimulus of a weakening question, we often say "No this doesn't have to be true because.…