Look if I got rejected,> @Constantine said:
I see your point. The advice is for a 165+ score. Most people never get it anyway. But yes, if you want to get 165+, explanations should be the last resort, especially "content-based explanations" (…
@HopefullyHLS said:
@"LSAT Killer" said:
@HopefullyHLS said:
You remind me of my first day at my previous employer, a management consulting company, when I got asked by a colleague if it is common for people with …
@HopefullyHLS said:
You remind me of my first day at my previous employer, a management consulting company, when I got asked by a colleague if it is common for people with a science background to refuse asking for help if we don't know somethi…
Also reading your comments explains a lot, why only 1% of test takers get 173+. Because when things get tough, everyone runs to a tutor or 7sage for comfort. You wanna be at the top, you gotta toughen up and handle EVERYTHING on your own.
Waste you…
Let's get a few things cleared up.
1) I am not smart.
2) I am not trolling anyone.
3) I couldn't care less if you take my advice or don't.
4) I never subscripted to 7sage or spent a dollar on anything other than LSAT registration fees and acces…
Not joking pro, they call me the LSAT killer for a reason. If killing the lsat was true crime, I would get the death penalty after what happened last week.