Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
LSATcantwin
About
- Username
- LSATcantwin
- Joined
- Visits
- 7,686
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Sage, ⭐
Comments
-
Right that's the point I'm making. The distinction is that the NA will destroy the argument and the strengthening argument won't. They will put SA/streanthen questions in the AC to throw us off.
-
A NA question necessarily strengthens the argument. It's in the nature of the question type. The difference is that if we remove a NA we lose the entire argument because it becomes impossible. If we lose something that helps strengthen an argument w…
-
Okay guys...we need to stop talking about the logic game. People are getting too specific and it's against the LSAC rules. We need to be careful.
-
Ignore
-
Ignore
-
Ignore
-
Ignore
-
@barbie58t this is the same as I had...still trying to figure it out
-
@TheMikey dont lose your CANDOR bro. YOUR CANDOR IS IMPORTANT TO THE INTEGRATY OF THE JUDICIARY!
-
@TheMikey said: @LSATcantwin said: Isn't it possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first? Etc? How can you determine from order alo…
-
Isn't it possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first? Etc? How can you determine from order alone?
-
Hi all I'm here now. So about the LSAT...LG way easy...RC average and 3 LR so I have no hope of knowing which one is real....also I'm guessing -9 curve?
-
My proctors made people take hats off and tuck hoods of sweatshirts in
-
https://az616578.vo.msecnd.net/files/2016/07/25/636050135774397498-151544126_tumblr_inline_nz08ighmA31sfqdgl_500.gif
-
Ignore
-
@TheMikey said: @Mellow_Z said: @TheMikey said: wat ded so either I'm insanely terrible at RC or the analytics for that RC section is a LIE I think the former tho I think it's subject…
-
Thank you! And @Freddy_D thanks haha
-
Contract law. I want everything to do with contract law if I can. And because many people have told me I couldn't do it...sooooo here I am!
-
Oh! My test site has both, hoover people and someone at the front. Zone onto the test, zone EVERYTHING else out!
-
Take them off when checking in, put them back on during the test! I really think it's that simple, glasses don't change your appearance that much.
-
Interesting, PT 80's LR felt harder to me than PT 79's by a lot. I would say I felt PT 81 was closer to PT 79 than 80. I think it's all just kind of personal preference, and what clicks for us.
-
@akistotle Is your finger okay? I'm not quite sure it should bend like that just kidding!
-
Sufficent Assumption - If you score -7 in reading comp on PT 70 and PT 81 then fk RC. Now your conclusion can be properly drawn. Also - Reading comp for me is this weird entity....it's either easy or hard. Nothing in between, and for whatever reas…
-
@johanna586 said: I totally bombed both LR sections (1st section was worse than the 2nd), but I did better than I have done on RC and LG (got them all right, usually I'm at -2!). And now I'm reviewing my extra 5th section and I got -2 in LR..…
-
@"Paul Caint" said: Wow! I'm surprised. In LG I thought the only unconventional question was Game 4, but you did well on it so I'm unsure. I actually found the RC to be a little bit difficult. Maybe you're just psyching yourself out/burni…
-
@jkatz1488 said: @LSATcantwin thanks for commenting. That makes sense and I think it needs to be true for this AC to be correct. But the AC doesn't say "preventing future crimes", it says "potential criminals". I don't know how bridge the two.…
-
The potential crime is not referring to the criminal's past crime; but instead, to the crime they might commit with the gun in the future (hence potential criminals) This means ------- nothing should be done to restrict potential criminals (people …
-
Literally bringing Scooby snacks because why not!
-
My name is LsatCantWin, and I have an LSAT problem. I'm hoping to end on Sept 16...
-
@cal270 said: Out of curiosity--did you struggle with LR section 1? that was tougher than usual, in my view Yep! 19-24 I missed every single one. Lol one block of crap. Idk what happened