@Victoria14
Don't get down! I've been with this test for over a YEAR. I started at 150, and it's taken me this long to break into the 170's and I'm still not even doing that consistently enough.
You've got the time, and the drive. This test will b…
@Victoria14
Haha rn I spend half my time on this form, half my time studying and a third half of my time sleeping. That's literally my life, I think you're doing better than I am.
Even at work I refresh this website and Reddit because I'm obsessed…
@Victoria14 said:
@Freddy_D said:
That's what I like to hear! Congrats on the progress!!!
I truly never thought I would get a -3, let alone anything under a -6 in all honesty! It's so exciting to see hard work paying off. I…
Breath! It sounds like this could be a case of burn out. I vehemently spoke out about burnout not being real. Then @"Cant Get Right" @"Alex Divine" @Freddy_D and a few others beat me over the head. I took a break - like a real one, multiple days - …
@TheMikey said:
Can be that you need to warm up with LR before doing a PT. Can also be that the PTs you've noticed this pattern on have harder questions for the first LR?
According to 7sage the difficulty doesn't matter. I've gone -2 on the …
Stem - I don't see why you'd read the stimulus first. I want to know what I'm suppose to be doing, before I do it. Stim first seems back asswords to me.
It could be a lot of things. I have a similar problem, and I think most people do. It can come down to confidence, time, misreading, not clearly understanding the argument, being distracted, tired the list goes on and on.
What is important is to tr…
I think a lot of the time people get TOO caught up in conditional logic. To prephrase an answer, what are you actually doing? You are shoring up/attacking the argument. So let it come naturally.
If you have an argument that says:
Today Bob went to…
Ignore it and move on. Seriously, all it's going to do is hurt you to linger on a low score. Blind review, look at what you missed, learn from the mistakes and move on. Everyone see fluctuations in score. It could be something as simple as being tir…
@AJordanMD
I know what you are saying but use the arguments main conclusion as a base for what you are comparing them to.
Main conclusion:
Any star that contains no lithium is not a CBD
AC: A essentially says - well it's possible a CBD use to b…
@"Cant Get Right" said:
I suspect JY hovers in the high 170's. He's not in shape; he has no reason to be in peak condition. Given a month or two to get into form, he'd 180 it all day every day.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6vkw7qL_4_E/VaVhIyTZT…
@AJordanMD Sorry - I made a second comment about AC B.
I think you are making decent arguments - but the important thing is to remember what the main conclusion is.
AC:A directly talks about CBD's and gives the possibility to have a CBD without li…
I didn't really fully answer what you asked.
So we see by my first comment that AC: A does have some baring on the conclusion of the argument. It's creates the possibility that a CBD has no lithium.
Now for AC: B
"Most stars that are too cool to …
So I'm going to attempt to tackle this - go easy on me because my confidence in explanations is very low.
The stimulus says;
"All Starts but the coolest of brown dwarfs are hot enough to completely destroy lithium."
We are on the same page here. …
@jkatz1488 said:
i think my approach to these questions is to rely heavily on prephrasing. Much of the time, you can tease out areas of agreement, disagreement, and most importantly, not mentioned, before entering the AC. The AC seem extra da…
@windows95 said:
Great post
Great user name! Windows 95 was best 95.
@tringo335 It's my way of giving back to the community. A lot of times I don't feel confident enough to help answer questions. So I give motivation instead! It's a lot saf…
@"Connie Lingus" said:
@LSATcantwin
Could you give a little more info on this?
"For NA negate EVERY AC on the question. Get in the habit of seeing how a negated answer impacts the argument."
So when you do a NA question as a drill,…
The first most important tip I can give you is DONT STOP. Seriously, plateaus break when you least expect it, and you'll look back wondering when and how it even broke. Keep going, a 160 is completely possible.
Secondly I would really focus on the …
@blljhnsn35 said:
Team WS (writing sample). My June writing sample would have convinced every one of you to be pro toll bridge.
If 7Sage had something like Reddit gold, you woulda just got it haha
@vtm14 said:
LG all day, every day. The fact I can CONFIDENTLY answer everything and literally prove every single thing is so satisfying. I'm a literature major so you would think RC was my favorite but it's essentially a glorified LR section.…
@tylerdschreur10 said:
Obviously stress on test day is inevitable, unless you are a Zen machine I think you have to take all the steps you can to.mi I miss it and deal with it. For me things that help are as follows:
1. Take prep tests in …
Try to picture games in real life.
5 Kids and 4 adults are going on a trip. They will be split into exactly 3 groups. Three people per canoe.
Also we have 9 slots - and 9 people available. How can we repeat someone without leaving them behind? Po…
@kvbusbee said:
Team LG all the way! I actually find the games really fun and I am super crossing my fingers that I get an LG experimental in September. On the other hand, RC is my mortal enemy. So I'll probably end up with that as my experime…
@Freddy_D Ahh yes, team RC. I see them as the Hufflepuff of LSAT. Yes they exist but everyone is really looking at Sytherin(LR) and Gryffindor(LG).
@"Cant Get Right" LR is such an annoyance, I went - 5 in one section today and - 0 in another. Where…