Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
LSATcantwin
About
- Username
- LSATcantwin
- Joined
- Visits
- 7,686
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Sage, ⭐
Comments
-
@fmihalic2 said: @LSATcantwin said: Are you me?! I have this exact same issue. LR sits around -3 a section, LG is typically -1 and then RC....-8! every time! I am interested to see what answers you get here. Lol I guess so …
-
Are you me?! I have this exact same issue. LR sits around -3 a section, LG is typically -1 and then RC....-8! every time! I am interested to see what answers you get here.
-
@Freddy_D said: Congrats on all of the success! I'm about to dive into the timed section portion of my study process, and I am a little nervous tbh haha Don't be! As you get use to things time will become less and less a concern. As you get …
-
This sounds like the name of a progressive Indy band. The Chronic Bubbling Errors will go on tour next week and are sure to play their #1 hit "I Had to Pee during Section 4"
-
My motivation comes from the test itself. I cannot let this damn test beat me. I AM capable of my goal score and school. Every wrong answer, low score, or confusing stimulus is another thing to propel myself off of.
-
So much information is missing here. I am not even sure where to start. First let us start with time frame. If you started studying in March, it has been just over three months of study time. That is the bare minimum amount of time that is suggested…
-
@goingfor99th said: Speed is a function of accuracy. If you want to get faster at RC, you do so by becoming more accurate. Do a lot of untimed RC passages, and don't move on from them until you're sure you've highlighted the source of/justifie…
-
The single biggest thing for me was learning to see how rules interact. There are "hidden" rules so to speak, within most games. Also keep in mind where each piece of the game stands. Has it already been used? What variables are left to be used? Som…
-
This is awesome, loved reading all of your dreams/nightmares and experiences. Just remember, our brains are masters of making things seem worse than they are. The real LSAT is nothing more than a test or a growing experience and you can do it. Only …
-
So a lot of good advice has been given here. I want to attempt to help a bit more. Whenever I asked questions like this, people would just repeat what the CC or some book said. Which is good, but it didn't help me. I understood what I was suppose to…
-
See I understand what a 1+1=3 is, my problem is when they word that answer choice as; "The argument mistakenly compares two things that cannot be compared, and then draws an inaccurate conclusion based on that comparison." My head does not say "oh…
-
@btmccartney I'm working on it, thanks for the tips. The abstract language kills me. I'm going to have to just drill them into my head until I can both predict them and understand what they mean. @"Alex Divine" I actually think the LSAT trainer hu…
-
This question is what the term diabolical was invented for.
-
@"Accounts Playable" said: This is one of my favorite LSAT questions because it requires you to really think about the practicality of a plan like this. The new calendar would standardize the days of annual events and stuff. Answer A: No…
-
@"Dillon A. Wright" said: (In case it helps, there's another thread from last year on this question: https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/7542) It helped a little. Still doesn't stop them from taking religious days off every 7th…
-
Thanks, I am definitely working on identifying flaws better and understanding what they mean. Maybe that will help, but when I read those answer choices I just become lost. The wording really throws me off the trail of the right answer.
-
Honestly, I feel like that some times without any outside factor. I believe you are perfectly normal in this regard.
-
@AllezAllez21 said: From your explanation, I actually think your reasoning for C is much more a direct attack on the premise than what answer E says. You say that C implies the "card game could not have allowed for an accurate reading," b…
-
@AllezAllez21 said: Just real quick, the question you're referring to is from PT35. Might want to update the title if possible. I'll look at it and get back to you. doh... ill try and fix it
-
It may help to put this into words, easy ones. If you are a Dog, then you are Fluffy. D->F or /F -> /D You are asking /F -> D which says; If you are not Fluffy, then you are a Dog. Does that sound right? We just said that all Dogs MUS…
-
@"Alex Divine" said: Your motivation is much appreciated! I like to re-motivate as often as I shower (daily, lol) Lol if I showered as much as I need to motivate myself for this test I think I'd actually dissolve
-
@"Daniel.Sieradzki" said: This made my day! I love getting inspirational advice and tips from Vault Boy. Wait.... This isn't part of a scheme by Vault-Tec, is it? Because I don't think I want to be in a vault full of LSAT takers. Vault 180 won…
-
@JustDoIt said: Always see these kinds of things when I feel like I'm going crazy haha Don't let your dreams be dreams!
-
@MrYC1995 said: I mean, the negation of little could be not little. This would then include a range from moderate to a great amount. Remember, contrapositives are not oppositions but rather contradictions. You opposed little with a lot. That's…
-
@jknauf said: Lets take a look at question #22 Preptest 35 section 1 This is a sufficient assumption question which reads; No chordates are tracheophytes, and all members of Pteropsida are tracheophytes. So no members of Pteropsida b…
-
@"nessa.k13.0" said: I can (I will later) tell you what I think but that wouldn't help get to the root of what you may not be seeing. Just getting off work and headed home. I'll break it down when I get the chance!!
-
@"nessa.k13.0" said: @LSATcantwin said: On regular weaken questions I do fine. It's just the causation ones. This might sound strange, but it feels like there are too many possible ways to weaken the causation argument…
-
@"nessa.k13.0" said: Hi @LSATcantwin it seems like you could be having an issue seeing how the given reasons in a stimulus do not lead to the conclusion or you could be having trouble understanding how to do the task of weakening an argument c…
-
@"Alex Divine" said: When I first began, I too felt that way. You can always drill questions or entire sections to gauge improvement. I think it is best to only PT once you have finished the CC and have every Q type down pretty well. If you're…
-
Honestly I get excited about them because I view them as games. Okay, that doesn't help much on its own. The thing that really gets me into logic games is that I have this desire to "crack the code". Each game presented to me is like a new puzzle th…