Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
LSATisland
About
- Username
- LSATisland
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,162
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive Sage
Comments
-
Welcome! Good luck with your prep! The good news is LSAT scores expire after five years, so that 131 should be gone.
-
If you're just starting, they're not bad. Speed improvement depends on where you are up to. If you are beginning, don't focus on time; it will improve with practice.
-
Yes, drilling is a good idea. If you know which questions you're weak at, try doing those and analyzing them well afterwards. You could try the same thing for your RC problem: print out a stack of RC from tests you've done in your previous prep. Dri…
-
I took the LSAT already and no longer have my PTs. But if you message me the details of the question, I'd be happy to help.
-
http://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/569/study-buddy-in-toronto-
-
17 points is huge! Great work!
-
@johnscottwilsonsr499 - great work!
-
http://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/560/study-groupbuddy-in-toronto-canada
-
I took the LSAT already and no longer have my preptests. But if you message me the details, I'd be happy to help.
-
The percentiles are based on three years worth of test takers.
-
Wow, they have the dates set into 2016.
-
Try writing explanations for the question: the reason why the correct answer is right and the flaw in each of the incorrect choices.
-
Why was the test rescheduled? Weather?
-
I took the LSAT already and no longer have my PTs. But if you message me the details, I'd be happy to help.
-
More LSAT! Do old tests again. Go over any fundamentals you are getting wrong. Read material that helps for RC. Do LG that you have done on your spare time. When I was studying for the LSAT, I had a huge stack of LG from tests I had done, with many …
-
Great idea! Keep up the good work.
-
Breaks are important. You'll come back refreshed.
-
@rbleal007 -- I'm not sure if your message was directed to me. If it was, I'd be happy to help. Just message me the details.
-
When I was prepping, it depended on the week. I think I would normally do more than two tests per week, but I needed to grab as much time as I could because I, regrettably, gave myself only two months to study. Make sure to find a rhythm that is n…
-
@callthecenter -- Wow, great increase. Keep improving! (Quite the dedication with the hour log. I like it.)
-
If you plan on doing the Blind Review, you would review the questions afterwards (without timing yourself), but before checking the right answer. So your Step 2 (if you meant marking your test) should be after Step 3. I believe the scorer has two …
-
I think you can definitely reach your goal on a retake. People have achieved greater score increases on their second take. You would need to put in the hours and work, but it is definitely doable. I don't know what your study schedule and approach…
-
'Vulnerable to criticism' questions are kind of like 'weaken' questions. You are identifying the issue that is weak. It can be an assumption the argument is making, or an appeal to authority, or mistaking % for numbers, etc... As LSATPuppy wrote, i…
-
Nobody mentioned Lord of the Rings. You gotta learn to read more carefully if you want that 180...
-
Gonna get started... No spoilers!
-
I think the initial posters were asking for the February test. What did you guys end up doing? And did it work? Share the experience!
-
I'd do the fresh ones first. Maybe save a couple for close to June. That way you do the used tests later on in your study, and your memory of them will be foggier.
-
Don't worry, J.Y. Everyone understands you were only trying to help. It makes sense to try focusing on the games that appear frequently. Even Powerscore mentions these rare games should not be studied to an equal degree. Unfortunately, LSAC does n…
-
Maybe. Doesn't hurt to try.
-
It won't be LSAC's first encounter with such a complaint. Hopefully, they will allow you to retake for free. Not much else they can do.