@"Jennifer-4" said:
I agree. I thought LG was easier n RC were a lot more difficult to read. One (I forget which) I felt like they wrote it then sat down with a thesaurus n changed words for fun -they didn't seem natural. I thought LR had so…
@SerenityFalcon said:
@BagelBiter You're not alone!
I had the same sections as you in the same order today, and also took the December LSAT, scored like you then, and feel exactly the same in every respect!
I'm guessing my Feb. sco…
This is why I love 7Sage. Even all you guys who are done with the test/retaking in June take the time to log in to the forums and wish others well. It is much appreciated!
@kshutes13 said:
I was the opposite. I found RC (edited) to be a breeze and LG to be brutal.
Very interesting! And I thought RC (edited) was my strongest section with LG being reliably my weakest haha.
The LSAT can definitely throw us for a…
Actually felt like I made a major improvement over my last score on this LSAT! February wasn't half as scary as I thought it would be haha.
I got LG LR RC(fake) RC(real) LR. Felt like LG was a breeze, LR was kind of weird but manageable, and RC was…
@btsao650 said:
Question about LR experimental sections:
Are real questions mixed with fake questions throughout the 3 LR sections?
Or is it the case that if you get 3 LR sections-2 sections are ENTIRELY real and 1 section is ENTIRELY …
A PhD might be worth it, but only if you have intentions to pursue an academic career (or if you wanted to get into patent prosecution as a hard science/engineering PhD, but that's a different story altogether). This especially holds true if the PhD…
@mark-3 provided me with a more thorough and constructive edit than I could have possibly imagined when I sent my PS in for the one-time edit through 7Sage. I can't recommend his services strongly enough!
I am definitely glad that he's part of the …