Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Matt Sorr
About
- Username
- Matt Sorr
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,798
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, ⭐
Comments
-
I think it depends, for the most part, on what you mean by "approaching quick." If you're testing in August and only have about 1.5 months, then I'd recommend you jump to the sections that are troubling you the most. In particular, if you're weak in…
-
Congratulations! Remarkable improvement!
-
Congratulations! Quite literally an almost perfect score!
-
Interested!
-
Congratulations! I always appreciate posts like this with great advice!
-
For now, it's online. Before COVID, the test was administered on tablets at testing centers. If they decide to move the test back in-person, I imagine they'd stick with the tablets. I doubt it'll ever revert to paper.
-
If I understand correctly, the green bar shows you the percentage of 7Sagers that chose that answer choice. The analytics are pulled from people who took the full, timed PT. The score above the bar shows you the average final score of the people who…
-
Speed with LG typically seems to come from becoming more comfortable with the game types, learning consistent and effective ways to diagram rules that repeat, learning inferences that repeat and how to see how rules interact, and a lot of practice. …
-
Interested! 158 diagnostic and fool proofing before PTing.
-
Thanks a ton for doing this! I am going to try to be in attendance.
-
If your weakest section is LG, I’d recommend stopping everything you’re doing and fool proofing the games from the tests you’ve taken and the games from PTs 1-35. If you’ve completed the CC then you should’ve watched a video lesson about fool proofi…
-
I don’t think LSATMax’s explanation is in conflict with JY’s. From what I can tell, they say the same thing, but the methodology is slightly different. The difference is that LSATMax recommends always making the part of the sentence before the “unl…
-
I think the answer depends on what you mean by "a little." If the courses brought your GPA down by, say, .01 or .02, then I don't think an addendum would be necessary. If you failed the community college classes then it may be worth writing an adden…
-
I'm not an admissions advisor, but I think that your time in the military will more than make up for any lack of extracurriculars. I by no means intend to reduce your military service to a simple "soft factor," but in the realm of law school apps, …
-
I believe an addendum addressing your uGPA is a necessity. As you mentioned, uGPA is the hard factor schools focus on, so writing an addendum stating something along the lines of "my uGPA doesn't reflect my potential; look at my grad GPA" seems esse…
-
As @jasg2345 recommended, I’d suggest studying LG and, assuming you’re not already nailing it, LR. In two months, the sections you’re likely to see the most improvement in are LG and LR. If you’re doing well in these, focus on RC.
-
If you’re looking for the most bang for your buck, then start fool proofing logic games. The core curriculum explains the concept of “fool proofing” and, in my experience, most people can pick up points in LG pretty quickly.
-
This is a great post! Thank you.
-
I haven't heard anybody give a definitive answer to this, but here's a forum that discusses it: https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/comment/194944. It may be helpful to read through it.
-
Interested!
-
Which question?
-
I’m interested!
-
Let me start by saying that whether or not you work before law school is a highly personal decision. I wouldn't advise that you base your decision to work solely on how you think it will affect your law school admissions odds. With this being stated…
-
Interested
-
Which question are you referring to?
-
Thank you!
-
@CSieck3507 hit it right on the head. That’s a difficult question to answer without knowing where you’re starting and where you’re hoping to end up (and even with that info nobody can give you a certain answer). Personally, I recommend letting your …
-
People have mixed opinions on this. I personally don't recommend taking PTs before completing the curriculum because I don't think it's as beneficial to test yourself on sections you have no training in. Many people like to take PTs while they go th…
-
The valid and invalid forms are mostly useful with LR questions that rely heavily on formal logic (often questions like parallel method of reasoning or flaw). I believe later in the CC, not long after learning the forms, you’ll go over some question…