Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Michael.Cinco
About
- Username
- Michael.Cinco
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,029
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Sage, ⭐
Comments
-
Thread bump. Please feel free to join!
-
Hi Bill I believe that the admin said the videos will be available a month after the pt is posted. In the meantime I will be hosting a blind review session a week after the PT is posted here. It may not have JY's explanations but it will have mine a…
-
So as mentioned above necessary assumptions must be true for the conclusion to be true. There are two flavors of necessary assumption there are bridgers and defenders. Let's go into a bit of detail about each one. Bridgers act very similarly to su…
-
They always provide value because it gives you an alternative perspective on the question and how to tackle the ACs
-
If you are having issues tied to memorizing certain things then use the questions to prompt you to read the relevant parts of the passage. Your understanding of the structure of the passage should help you determine what is relevant.
-
I'm a big proponent of timed tests all the time. Time is a huge component to the lsat and it's never too early to incorporate it into your training. The BRs are of course untimed and that's where you can really take time to dig deep into a question…
-
You guys need to have the whatsapp app either on your phone or your computer (whatever you are using to access this site) to get in the group chat
-
@ericauhunmwangho said: @"Michael.Cinco" said: Theres alot that goes into timing issues. Here are things that can slow you down: Not having a set strategy for attacking the question type BEFORE you engage with the…
-
Theres alot that goes into timing issues. Here are things that can slow you down: Not having a set strategy for attacking the question type BEFORE you engage with the stimulus. You have to have a plan on how to attack every question type. This pla…
-
@99thPercentileOrDieTryin said: Score to guarantee T14? 180. Seriously, I never saw the point in aiming lower than the top. Even if you don’t ever hit such heights, make it your goal anyway. On the face of it that seems reasonable but a pe…
-
I specialize in helping students try to get to the 170's. Send me a DM. I'd love to help!
-
Hello! I am a tutor and currently accepting students. I am hosting an office hours type question and answer period (for free) tonight at 7 if you would like to ask some questions hit me up with a DM.
-
https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2019/10/14/lsat-removes-logic-games-section/ It appears to be the case in 4 years.
-
You could just create a problem set with that question and see the answer that way or download the pdf which should have the answer key in the back.
-
Hi Shania theres a bunch of us in this group chat looking to take the lsat in the Jan timeframe https://chat.whatsapp.com/HEr9S37YrIFBZNN6w4pFpZ
-
Hey guys I'm taking the exam in Jan along with some others. You can join my study group on what's app https://chat.whatsapp.com/HEr9S37YrIFBZNN6w4pFpZ
-
Way to go Nicole. I'm really proud of you! For anyone going through the lsat struggles theres a bunch of us (Nicole included) who are part of whatsapp groupchat dedicated to lsat prep. Join us on the link below! https://chat.whatsapp.com/HEr9S37Y…
-
Thanks @babridger17 . I am definitely open to taking on more students!
-
B is a tricky wrong answer choice. In the context of the stimulus voter confidence in the economy tends to favour the incumbent. It is not talking about individual voter preferences nor even individual voter investment choices, no it says measure…
-
Thanks for participating guys. For those that want to join the group chat. The whatsapp link is below https://chat.whatsapp.com/HEr9S37YrIFBZNN6w4pFpZ
-
@Peaceofmind said: @"Michael.Cinco" Thank you for your explanation. I’m still confused by this question though. I chose C because I thought negating the necessary condition would destroy the conclusion, but I do realize that the suffi…
-
There is a bit of a gap between the premise and conclusion as there always is on most argument in the lsat. P1. In a study 30 years worth of weather patterns in several industrialized urban areas it was found that weekends tended to be cloudier t…
-
Unless you know the relative sizes of A B and C that is not something you can infer
-
Ah you're right. Well stepping into Lsac's shoes what D is saying I suppose is that changing the environment does have an impact on participation in sports as shown by the participation changes across time and cultures. I thought that answer was w…
-
Oh yes that one. The problem with the argument it is saying environmental factors does not have an impact on participation in sports but it never controls for other variables. without controlling for other variables in an experiment it makes it ve…
-
I wouldn’t put it past LSAC but if they used clarify it would have to make a point to say that the clarification is in support of the conclusion. That’s what was missing from that answer choice.
-
It's a correlation to causation error. You're going to have to somehow show that the correlation they established isnt actually a causal relationship. B does that by saying the traumatic events Did not cause these people to have higher cortisol le…
-
With questions like Argument Part or main conclusion...I try not to bother assessing how strong or weak the argument really Is, just what it is trying to do. So yeah weak argument but its validity is not in scope of what we are trying to achieve. Sa…
-
The sometimes is there to help you because it makes you less likely to choose it as the wrong answer choice. Remember that the main correlation to causality we are trying to break here is traumatic event --> more cortisol. Already A starts us o…
-
I just did that section. If you look at it, this is how it is structured. P1.Most poets author has met are disposed to melancholy Conclusion: If P1 is representative then one can conclude that many poets are made melancholy by writing poetry. AP…