@lschoolgo
Instead of searching for the right answer, look for any reason to eliminate an answer choice. Many people do not know how to effectively utilize the POE method. You have to zero-in on every single word. The answer choice says "most," …
You cannot tell which section is the experimental. If you could, people would take a thirty-five minute nap and the test-writers would have no way of assessing the difficulty of the exam.
No disrespect intended, but that has to be the worst idea that I have heard up to this date. You're either ready or you're not. That's all there is to it. These last two weeks are not for improvement. We are almost at the finish line. The maxim…
I agree, @7sagelsatstudent180
Certain score bands are characteristic of test-takers with different score levels.
Examples:
A 165 test taker can expect to range between 161-167. Someone who scores in the mid 160s is unlikely to drop into the 150s. …
Blood, sweat and tears.
You need to work on LG. Getting -0 in LG will likely put you in the low to mid 170s. Complete the logic games bundle and use he fool proof method.
@LSATdogfml
@nicole.hopkins
It's not a reliable sample because people are on many different levels. Let's say only 20% got an answer correct. Now, you might conclude that the question is difficult. But what if the 80% who chose the wrong answer…
@LSATdogfml
Just because a question has a five star rating does not mean that it's very difficult. The rating comes from the number of 7sagers who got the question wrong.
I actually find PT 65+ (including the 70s) to be much easier than earlier PTs. There were some stimuli in the 40s and earlier PTs that I could not understand for the life of me. They had a very convoluted form. Newer PTs are much better written a…
@paramedikisto said:
I've taken 4 PTs
Stop taking PTs. You're wasting precious material of which there is only a finite amount. Read The LSAT Trainer by Mike Kim, enroll in the 7sage course, do some drilling, and work on your fundamentals. You …