Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Nicole Hopkins
About
- Username
- Nicole Hopkins
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,567
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive Sage, Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
@tbram519 said: Should I mention this stuff in an addenda? No way! @tbram519 said: There is no other professor I was very close to/could expect a letter from in a short amount of time. DEFINITELY ask this person. Oh, and you should post a ver…
-
@"J.Y. Ping" said: PrepTest C 2? My vote is for 2C (or IIC) Or just "The Other C"
-
@beth.flanders said: Oops, thanks @"Nicole Hopkins" for catching that Well LSAC just had to be a jerk and make it confusing—now we have 2 Superprep C's! Ain't got no time!!!
-
@"bulletproof_machinegun" said: What "trainer" are you talking about? The LSAT Trainer by Mike Kim [click here to grab it on Amazon]
-
@beth.flanders said: According to Manhattan Prep Superprep C is listed as February 2000. Not the same test we're talking about
-
@Pacifico said: It was my understanding that February tests don't get disclosed for ten years but I don't know where I read that. It is post-2007.
-
@jutleyth said: Wow, we could never know! We'll know
-
@jutleyth said: My copy of the Superprep II booklet just arrived, and much to my dismay, LSAC does not indicate what month and year that the C test is. We've had the same question and are still waiting to find out, as far as I know! My belief is t…
-
@DumbHollywoodActor said: I like to think the whole "Elle studies LSAT” montage in Legally Blonde takes place over a 2-year period. It makes me feel better. AMEN!
-
@Pacifico said: Retake PTs. The Dude speaks true.
-
@cjones76 said: he is applying your mantra! Right??!
-
Yup, it's a rather sadistic marketing scheme. Be extremely wary of any school that approaches you with unsolicited "offers" of ANY scholarship, let alone full scholarship following LSAT score release. They are trying to get you to apply to increase …
-
@cverdugo said: I got better at RC because I began treating it like LG. My hero!
-
@ChoboPie said: Just looked back at my very next PT, and it was a 161... Ok—so just 10 points above a lot of us Still a very solid early PT score.
-
@BruiserWoods said: I often have to take SEVERAL "extra steps" where others may be able to do them quickly in their heads. Kind of like when we were little kids and had to "show our work" in math class. There you go! You gotta do what works for y…
-
@ChoboPie said: 170, but that was with a break after every section. Ah. Congrats—just always like to clarify for folks so that they can manage their expectations. A lot of us start 20 points below where you did. That can help to put advice given i…
-
@ChoboPie —What was your diagnostic score?
-
@BruiserWoods said: What I do is not only look at the micro-arguments within each paragraph, but I have tried to train my brain to start looking at each PARAGRAPH as it's own "argument part." I like this! Don't personally label this kind of stuff …
-
@rockytoral said: read Supreme Court decisions regularly. Reading is not enough! You must read with attention to argument/reasoning structure. You must strive to understand the nature of support and of inferences; what does it truly mean for somet…
-
@"lawyerme?" said: I am in the 140s during practice tests untimed. Never ever do this, ever again
-
@c.janson35 said: Also, you can always call LSAC directly and ask this question; it may be more comforting to hear the answer directly from them. I agree with this.
-
@nye8870 said: When the time is up everyone types their choice in the comments. Afterwards we discuss our reasoning. I think it could be an interesting exercise to tease out good/bad intuitive tendencies. Great idea for a workshop, Matt I'll ad…
-
Thanks, folks—keep em comin'!
-
-
AND @"Quick Silver"
-
Paging @c.janson35