Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
NotMyName
About
- Username
- NotMyName
- Joined
- Visits
- 5,654
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Sage, ⭐
Comments
-
The PTs here have 4 sections because that is all that is released. If you want to practice a 5 section test, you'll need to pilfer from another PT no matter which service you get your PTs from. Some folks swear by the 5+ section PTs. That was never…
-
@10000019 That all makes sense. Thanks. I think I'll still peruse it to fill up the time between now and applications if nothing else.
-
@10000019 why not reliable? Do you know of another site that shares info about school culture?
-
@lsatplaylist nah but I do love that site. @akistotle THAT’S IT! Thanks!
-
@tbrit011 that's -5 in each LR right? How are you studying LR, specifically? In my case, I focused on getting LR to -3 before shifting to RC. LR is a mini-RC in many cases so the improvement in LR can transfer to RC. It worked really well for me.
-
Try video taping yourself. I've had this happen to me and it's often the result of some process breakdown; video is helpful in making that clear.
-
I know the feeling, but as others have said, NYU/UCB all but require a better score. Do your best to reset. Exercise more than usual, improve your diet, look at google images of NYU/UCB grads... this is the final push. That circle game only had 4 …
-
I have never had a -0 in RC or LG. Very jealous! Congrats!
-
You essentially scored your average (which is a great score by the way so congrats!) so I wouldn't suggest retaking until you've bumped that average up at least a few points. You may consider applying with this score and continuing to study so that …
-
It seems unlikely that you will score in the high 160s if your average is 163. People do, from time to time, outperform their average on test day but it's rare as you'd expect. I would recommend you forego the September take unless you're comfortab…
-
That LR average is demanding your attention. Do you BR solo or with others? Do you write out explanations or do cookie cutter review?
-
Definitely BR first. I'd stick with your current method. Would be surprised to see someone argue otherwise.
-
This has been my experience, too. I like to read novels in bed before I go to sleep and I started practicing recapping paragraphs, pages, and chapters as I read. It helped me do this more naturally.
-
Well-earned, Surfy! 168 is a fantastic score. Congratulation!
-
Clarifying the coincidence vs correlation... If a correlation was established, then a conclusion "take precautions if you hear the pilot of a small aircraft whistling during the flight" would be more strongly supported. We don't need whistling to c…
-
Argument summary: Premise 1: Tapes show that pilots of small aircraft involved in a minor accident were whistling immediately preceding that accident 80% of the time. Premise 2: Even minor accidents are dangerous. Conclusion: If passengers hear t…
-
Agreed with above. I don't think it's a fair assumption on the LSAT or in real life. Car speed relative to other cars on the road at that time would seem more appropriate.
-
Studentservice's suggestion worked me for me.
-
@"samantha.ashley92" That's how it appeared based on LSACs email but based on other forum posts, it's much less clear. It definitely appears to be open to anyone who registered for July. But some who did not register for July have said that they wer…
-
@manchild did you receive an email confirmation on your September registration? Does September show as a future registration on your LSAC page? Check out this relevant forum post https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/17060/sept-extended…
-
Looks like it is only open to those who registered for July -- strange. July takers received this in their email: "To all July 2018 LSAT registrants, A number of July 2018 test takers have requested more time to register for the September 8, 2018…
-
@keets993 Thank you!
-
PT 84 is the June 2018 test, correct?
-
I'd say that's a very fair assumption to make, but a part of me is thinking your question in response to my own question was posed because of how obvious the answer is - that it is a fair assumption to make lol no I swear it's not so! In fact, …
-
@"Logic Gainz" do you think it's fair to assume that upon hearing testimony that, if true, is incriminating, a juror who believes that testimony gives different significance to it than a juror who does not believe it?
-
Sounds like the problem wasn't that you lacked outside knowledge, but that you made a bad assumption that poisoned your reasoning: juries work by defaulting to a not-guilty verdict when a unanimous decision to convict couldn't be reached. It's a sli…
-
Wow. Congrats!
-
Congrats Paul!
-
another 7sager. so happy for each of you! go out and celebrate!
-
You should download the (free) 7Sage app. It includes a test proctor feature which replicates actual test conditions including timing and the proctor's script. EDIT: Whoops! Sorry for totally side-stepping your question. Agree with Leah's comment b…