Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
NotMyName
About
- Username
- NotMyName
- Joined
- Visits
- 5,654
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Sage, ⭐
Comments
-
I understand logic pretty well; as i’ve already said, i’ve read through the LG bible and the LR bible. This has given me a pretty good understanding of If/then logic. Understanding such rules is never an issue. Again... i’m not a beginner at this…
-
@10000019 and @"surfy surf", Glad you mentioned this. Yes, it's probably good to put off the negotiations until there's an offer. The fact that this is a waiting-list situation changes my response to more of an enthusiasm/credential promotion let…
-
@lsatplaylist nailed it.
-
Hey David. It does help. That was my approach on the section under timed conditions. It's very cookie-cutter when we see it from that intuitive/loose perspective. I just think they used the wrong question stem here since we don't reach validity.
-
But in terms of the false dichotomy, I do think it's one or the other in this case since we are told "when these goals conflict".
-
I don't believe you've represented "B C D" correctly since B and C only share 3 of their 8 components. But you're right in that I'm applying an invalid argument form. B and D do not need to share any terms. Here's how I think the relationship shou…
-
Didn't always bubble this way but I have been for the past 6+ months. The transition was pretty smooth. I never had bubbling errors with either, but the system you lay out feels far more efficient because bubbling interrupts my rhythm less. I can al…
-
We are only dealing with 2 options: long-term or short-term and not both since they conflict. Therefore, if the long-term is usually the morally preferable option in these cases, then it must also be true that the morally preferable option is the lo…
-
IT'S A BI-CONDITIONAL MOST STATEMENT!
-
HA!
-
Whenever you choose to start fool-proofing, I suggest following this method https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/2737/logic-games-attack-strategy/p1 It's the go-to approach for this community.
-
Agree with the other 2 posters. I wouldn't advise pushing yourself through exhaustion because such a BR session would probably less productive. When I take a PT, it's usually the only LSAT related thing I'll do that day.
-
Probably what lsatplaylist said. But first do this https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7abldj0b3rxrZUxW/giphy.gif
-
Thank you Katz. It seems that doing PTs is the best way to figure out my weaknesses. I will start doing it now Be careful not to burn through too many PTs. Sounds like you've taken 4-5 at this point? Have you been reviewing them? I'm scoring a…
-
Agree with Linds. I'd advise you against getting too caught up in specific sections because there are greater differences within PTs than between PTs. The test writers seem to maintain a consistent level of difficulty across PTs (it's a standardize…
-
I trust what Nicole shared, but in the spirit of full exposure, there's been plenty of shit-posting on LLL. https://www.reddit.com/r/LawSchool/comments/4kjg3t/kick_the_crap_out_of_law_school_your_thoughts/ I think most of the comments are from ske…
-
Seems to still be available for purchase. I hope he's not ending the course. https://larrylawlaw.samcart.com/products/ktcools-prime/
-
@LCMama2017 would you be comfortable post-poning a cycle to bring that lsat score up? That's the #1 thing you could do to improve your chances.
-
Members of this community have been split on this issue at least since I joined. My own opinion is that a diagnostic so early in one's prep is not helpful because you don't even know enough to properly BR the exam; you haven't learned strategies to …
-
I really like your plan of attack and I think a 169 is attainable based on what you've shared. There are shared fundamentals between the sections which means improvement in one section sometimes leads to indirect improvement in another. Fool proofi…
-
@Broccoli180 my guess is that you are dealing with unaddressed gaps in understanding. If that's the case, speeding up will make things worse. I would stay away from fresh PTs for a few weeks and just take timed section retakes, drill, and return to …
-
@akistotle Wait, are you missing only -5 on LR? If so, are sure you are scoring correctly? I think @jkatz1488's point is that if you are going -3 on LG and -10 (-5/-5) on LR, you are only missing like -13. Raw scores for low 150s are like 55 - 6…
-
I think this should be filed under "miss opportunities to make someone blush".
-
low 150s with -10 in LR? What is your LG score? Are you missing those questions in BR as well?
-
My first pt was a 146. I averaged 162 before test day and scored a 159. I skipped a cycle to retake and am now average 167. It's taken more than a year to get to this point but tbh, i should really only count the last 12 months since I wasn't with 7…
-
@"Seeking Perfection" Hey I lost you somewhere in the frequency argument, but the logic of it being equivalent to "Allen is in the park if and only if Chris is not in the park" pretty much makes sense to me with the caveat that it really should …