Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
NotMyName
About
- Username
- NotMyName
- Joined
- Visits
- 5,654
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Sage, ⭐
Comments
-
I agree that taking in June is not a good idea. You're not ready, and your timeline has forced you to cut too many corners already. Slow down and do it right. I promise you it will be much faster in the end. All really good advice above. This t…
-
@dennisgerrard @"Alex Divine" sweet! thanks for the info guys!
-
@Mellow_Z Thanks!
-
@AllezAllez21 agree and like the way you put that. Thinking about it in those terms helps us to remain appropriate broad in our negations.
-
@"Cant Get Right" /R-->/S (If a person isn't rich then that person isn't smart) But from there we have no where to go, I believe. That person who isn't rich and therefore isn't smart may actually still be Cool, but we don't know because of the …
-
@jkatz1488 is saying that if "/R" meant "there are no rich people," it would actually deny the whole relationship because there would be no such thing as a "smart person." Yes that is what I am saying. It is like a backdoor negation... cool stu…
-
@therealnas Well I hope this doesn't sound snarky but I am a mentor. I'm sure someone will jump in though since it seems like we are not connecting with each other lol. I really appreciate the energy you're putting into this discussion. I've become…
-
You do not get to conclude that there are NO rich people in the world @therealnas one of us is misunderstanding the other but I am not sure which. I am not concluding /R. smeraj3 provided /R as a premise and I am musing about 2 different concl…
-
It's an interesting example and I think it does well to show why the LSAT need not use more than just a few arguments because so much is possible by combining them or tossing in context via the messy English language. Before I confuse anyone with m…
-
hey @smseraj3 would you mind clarifying the conditional statement in your question? Particularly the relationship between B and C.. is that supposed to read B-->C? But yes, you can negate some-statements because they are ideas and we can negate …
-
Good advice above. Your approach will probably depend on where your strengths lie. If you're better at LG than LR (rare) then consider focusing on the CC before fool proofing games. If you're like most of us and LG is your weakest section to begin w…
-
Congrats everyone!
-
LOL! When I read the title I was thinking "Ah more spam" but this is a great advice and I think it's overlooked often.
-
oh cool. never looked at these rankings. thanks for sharing!
-
Congrats! It must be an exhilarating feeling -- soak it up and keep it going.
-
Yeah my experience is just about the same as yours. I make very few marks on the passage and RC is my best section. That said, the notation strategies do seem to make a tremendous difference for some out there. I think the approach is to give an hon…
-
@AngusMcGillis I think we have maxed out the nested replies in the comment section because it won't let me reply to you lol. But looking back on this question, I agree with everything Can'tGetRight, Sami, and JustDoIt say above. Strictly speaking, …
-
Skipping is perhaps most underrated soft skill in my opinion. 7Sage seems to be the only community which discusses it at the level of consideration it deserves. I agree with all the info above -- great advice from some really smart people. Sometime…
-
I don't know for sure, but I would guess that you won't be able to do that. LSAC has gone to great lengths to stop PDF versions of PTs circulating and if you were able to purchase on kindle and print, that would seem to effectively be the same as a…
-
If you take the LSAT many times, Adcoms may (rightly or wrongly) wonder about your ability to pass the bar on your first attempt (which they also report on later down the line). Ah I see! That makes sense.
-
@JustDoIt yeah i want to agree with that as well. But if our highest score continues to be the only one reported in the admissions figures, then why should school's care how many times you took it?
-
I think it's cool and should have always been this way. That said, I don't see it changing much. Most people will still study for 3 months and refuse to retake when they don't hit there scores so they can apply ASAP. Also, god knows how admission…
-
You may considering prioritizing which ACs to look at first based on the conclusions. For example, if the stimulus conclusion says "Therefore, dogs are good pets", in what order would you choose to review the following AC (only showing hypothetical …
-
@imharris I believe I took somewhere between 10 and 15.
-
I estimated my actual score within 1 point after sitting for the LSAT. I've found that to be case more often than not. Just curious. Why emphasize on training you post PT mindset?
-
@AllezAllez21 of course. I think of it as the overarching set of items we are working with, the domain of our focus, or simply scope. Consider the following "If you are an olympian sprinter you eat wheaties. But if you are an olympian swimmer, you s…
-
Question types in LR which commonly use formal logic include: MBT/F, (F)PR, SA, PSA, and NA. I suppose Flaw could be tossed in there too but formal logic isn't as common within that type as the sort listed above.
-
You'll need to get between 57-66 correct https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-score-percentile-conversion/ I must say that I would still recommend studying to reach your potential for practical benefits such as scholarships.