Yes, it is you who responded to my sincere response with snide sarcasm. I merely pointed out to you that 7Sage is not the place for that, and you responded with more rudeness.
I think it depends on the school. Not sure that you can get schools to say straight out who they consider URM. The operative term over here is "underrepresented." If a student body from a certain country is not underrepresented, then regardless of t…
This just reinforces what we already know: Different people find different PTs difficult. Kind of makes you question the standardization business. True, it's constructed so that a certain percentage of people get a certain score, but it would probab…
Yes, it's very unfortunate, but law school and law prep is not much different than other areas of life: The rich have more opportunities and an easier time at a whole bunch of things.
I don't know if this is the case, but if someone becomes adept (and hence, dependent) on splitting game boards, the later PTs can cause trouble, b/c I find that the games are less splitable. I personally think that whenever one comes across a game t…
@"vanessa fisher" There certainly is nothing wrong with brute forcing, and it is the best plan of attack sometimes. I was just saying that time issues are to be expected if brute forcing is a major part of one's LG attack, unless one practices to a …
@"vanessa fisher" Right. Even J.Y. does not get all the inferences. His ability to brute force at supersonic speed, though, is almost superhuman, so he can afford to miss some inferences and still be super fast.
Almost all does not exclude 100% any more than "most" does. The only reason that 100% does not contradict a statement that says most is b/c if 100% of A is B, it is true to say that most of A is B. The same is true for "almost all."
The reason why the section is constructed in such a way that it is hard to finish in time with brute forcing is that what's being tested is not really your ability to brute force, but your ability to make inferences. You are rewarded for making all …
If you need to brute force, it means that you are missing some inference. Getting better at making inferences up front is the key. As Mike Kim of LSAT Trainer says, you should not have to use hypotheticals more than once or twice per section. Of cou…
Got the sampler in the mail. I am really, really impressed with all the Mitsubishis. The Lumograph does indeed seem to be somewhere in between the Norica and the Wopex, but I gotta say, I think the Japanese pencils are superior.
They sometimes ratchet up the difficulty in LR and compensate with easier LG and RC. I wouldn't freak out, especially with a score of 175/176. That being said, it's hard to guarantee that you'll improve on your previous score of 172. Even someone wh…
People are more likely to chalk up a lousy performance on test day than a great performance to to the test environment or other random factors. They'll chalk up a great performance to their genius. So you are much more likely to hear horror stories …
I'm hoping the Lumographs will provide that elusive Goldilocks state between the Wopex and the Norica. I don't like how the Wopex writes, but the Norica doesn't stay sharp even for a single logic game.
I might be making a correlation/causation error, but I think my link to the pencil sampler a day ago might have caused them to go out of stock. Did anyone (besides for me) end up ordering one?