Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
OlamHafuch
About
- Username
- OlamHafuch
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,162
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@Hurricane11 said: @uhinberg said: What significance does Dave Killoran think that has? Unclear - it could mean nothing. Then again, what is the point of having staff in on a holiday? Maybe to mess with our minds, like 85…
-
What significance does Dave Killoran think that has?
-
Right near the top, there is an option that says "Delete this Preptest."
-
Rotating bezel is the way to go.
-
Yes, according to Powerscore, the June 2008 LSAT was released on Thursday, July 3, four days ahead of the announced day.
-
It's happened before -- 2008.
-
Hope you're right . . . but Jon Denning from Powerscore is predicting July 5.
-
@"Alex Divine" said: I actually don't think they are a waste, Powerscore that is. I think think fairly highly of the Bibles. Tons of people have used them to score 99%tile scores. I just think 7Sage teaches things more intuitively. I think …
-
I'll just echo what everyone's saying. Everything you need for success is included in the 7Sage package. I truly think that if more people knew about 7Sage, the other prep companies would go out of business. They give you so much less, while chargin…
-
I'm betting on tomorrow . . .
-
Pretty funny! My reaction's been pretty much limited to #2, 4, and 7, though, with an emphasis on #4. I mean, how hard really is it to have all those Scantrons read? And why, pray tell, is LSAC still administering a paper test in 2017? It is breat…
-
Yes, very good catch, @jkatz1488 ! Since this is such an important point, I'll just try to restate it in one sentence: If A causes B, then you know that if you don't have B, then you won't have A, but you cannot infer that not having B will caus…
-
@"Alex Divine" What's the line on that bet?
-
@Alex Divine. What's the official line on that bet?
-
What are the chances of that, @Zachary_P ?
-
Yes, they were mistakenly available to all for some time, but that was corrected around 3 weeks ago.
-
Much of the material is taken from published works (hence the attributions at the end of every preptest), but it is abridged and edited specially for the LSAT. I think that's what @jkatz1488 meant.
-
Maybe you should consider bubbling after each answer. I know you said that it interrupts your flow, but perhaps that's not as bad as making the bubbling mistakes.
-
@Farabian-Platonist: BTW, you can always buy the Ultimate now, and upgrade later. [You would, however, end up having access for less time, but you can always pay a bit extra to extend your subscription for additional months.]
-
Had I found out about 7sage before having spent well over $1000 on other prep materials, I would have certainly bought Ult+. 7Sage is by far the best value of any LSAT prep material, and if you can afford it and are willing to put in the time to mak…
-
Really depends on your state of mind. If you have any tinge of burnout, I think it would be counterproductive to just jump right back in. But if you're excited and motivated, perhaps there's no need for such a large break.
-
Because of how long it lasts, I like the Wopex for most of the test, but for LG I find it hard to write neatly with them. I searched and searched for a pencil that producing writing that is dark and sharp, I settled on these two: (1) Musgrave Test …
-
The stimulus says that physical theories can only explain two things: (a) why physical systems have physical structures; and (b) why physical systems perform various physical structures. It then concludes that a strictly physical theory cannot expla…
-
Here's a link for info about hand-grading. http://www.lsac.org/jd/lsat/handscoring
-
Here's the link: https://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/lr_15-hardest.cfm
-
Powerscore has an interesting blog post in which they claim that a tremendously high percentage (something like 80%) of the toughest LR questions of all time (don't remember how they decided which were the toughest of all time) had a credited answer…
-
@taylorwoodsloeb Great points! I seriously doubt that LSAC takes this into account even though they should. There was an extremely difficult experimental LG section that some test takers took, and could have very well shot their confidence for the r…
-
Thanks @Daniel.Sieradzki. Researching testing centers is not always foolproof, though, because testing centers do not always use the same rooms from one administration to the next. I checked out reviews for U of D, and they sometimes use classrooms …
-
My impression (which has been echoed on some other forums) is that one of the LR sections was a bit harder than usual, but the second LR section was average.
-
Katherine: The real LG section was unusually easy.