Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Pacifico
About
- Username
- Pacifico
- Joined
- Visits
- 3,029
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
Can we get to page 5 already?
-
If I were you I would try to get the three best possible academic LORs that you can and then one stellar professional/work LOR. Then use two academic and one professional LOR for all your apps and save the last LOR in case you need it for a WL.
-
+1 for your LR score this week!
-
The apps virtually fill themselves out so it is better to do them while you wait for your score to come back.
-
FYI most apps aren't released until after September 1st.
-
Also I hate to be that guy but you spelled prediction wrong so I'm taking an extra point off your RC score
-
Load up the trends page and then just sort by score and count down 10 from the highest score and that will be it.
-
Quick, go to grad school!
-
Super easy with 7Sage analytics!
-
Hopefully at least a 168... That was the bottom of my score range this time around and is the highest score I have gotten at least 10 times in PTs.
-
No way... If someone asks you to write the letter for them they are never going to write a good one. Run away.
-
Don't do it. In almost all circumstances it is super obvious when someone writes their own LOR and it takes a very elite level of writing ability (and humility) to pull it off, which I'm guessing might be an issue for you since you're here asking fo…
-
The general consensus is that any sections common to both the LSAT and GRE or GMAT are harder on the LSAT. That's why it is usually recommended to take the LSAT first. I've known people who prepped for a year for the LSAT, crushed it, and then brush…
-
Sure, it can help with RC type stuff... It's probably more helpful for the GMAT since there is baby LR involved there too...
-
Start now... And it's not like any work goes into your LORs so I'm not sure why you brought that up... But you do want everything done beforehand... You shouldn't be studying non-stop anyways so working on app stuff can be a good respite...
-
You can send whenever you like and update them as needed.
-
Don't cancel... Never cancel...
-
I've done the same thing and it made no difference... YMMV but I'm sure it won't be a big deal... Worst case scenario you have to ask for a hand grader or they just do it on their own because it gets messed up during the scan...
-
That poll is more indicative of how hilarious TLS is than anything else...
-
I didn't have that game. It was experimental I think. Why would you report something like that that didn't affect you? That's just bad karma right there.
-
Another way to go is just never cancel and then write an addendum and all will be forgiven. I'm way too curious a person to ever cancel or take an undisclosed test.
-
Felt like the easiest of the 70s all around. Fool proofing the bundle this last time definitely helped me rock the LG. Other than a few more months of PTs I don't think I would have done anything differently. Switching to 25 in 25 for LR has been a …
-
I thought December 2015 was -12.
-
Both my 25s were really easy but one was missing a very common question type so I'm pretty sure that was my experimental.
-
Do they make -10 curves for 101 question tests?
-
There is a fake 26 LR and a fake 25 LR.
-
Pretty sure they make an entire experimental test so at least 2 fake LRs, 1 fake LG and 1 fake RC.
-
I had 25 LR/23 LG/26 LR/25 LR/27 RC. There has been one 102 that I recall but this was definitely a 101. Your 25 LR was real.
-
LG was very straightforward and definitely the easiest of the 70s, although 76 was pretty easy as well. I finished almost 10 minutes early and had time to check almost every single question. RC was pretty average difficulty I would say. I had thr…
-
I would contend that a bubbling error is not necessarily a valid reason to cancel. You can always request a hand grader if there is some aberration and if you made an explainable error then the score can potentially be corrected. It is up to the dis…