Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Pacifico
About
- Username
- Pacifico
- Joined
- Visits
- 3,029
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
I would agree with @alexandergreene93 that this is likely not a good idea. Foolproofing works for LG because it develops your inference making skills, and even though you might remember some things, the nature of LG forces you to go through and make…
-
Oh it's nothing special, just very simple with three columns (Date, Time, Score) and four rows (Attempts 1-4) like I said, so for example if you're starting with PT 7 and made all four attempts over the past week your note should look something like…
-
Just go to the syllabus page and check off whatever you have finished or don't want to pop up as your next lesson. If you want to go back then just mark those with a star to revisit them. But if you just want to go do the old problem sets then just …
-
Let's use a really simple example of a sequencing game with seven slots. If you have elements A, B, C, D, E, F, and G and you know that the first five of those go in order in slots 3-7 and then you have an F/G and a G/F slot in 1 and 2, then everyth…
-
Take another PT. If timing was an issue when it hadn't been before then it sounds like you're just rusty when it comes to taking PTs, which is perfectly natural after spending 2-3 months or more just doing the curriculum and problem sets. Putting it…
-
I find that analytical deduction works best for me on questions with "could be" qualifiers in them, and to a lesser extent the "must be" qualifiers because in the former case, anything that moves is a candidate and everything else needs no considera…
-
It's definitely important to know what your diagnostic is because if all you need is a 160-163, it's possible you might already hit that, or be pretty close. You can definitely get through 7Sage in less than two months and then have a month or more …
-
I'm almost ten years removed from a sub 3.0 uGPA so it's 170 or bust for me...ideally in the 171-173 range is where I'd like to be to get me in at the T14 I want, but as @alexandergreene93 said, it mostly depends on the school you're shooting for. T…
-
I didn't purchase it and have only looked over the free content a couple of times, so I can't tell you much about it. However, the teacher and 7Sage recently parted ways and June 15th was the last day to purchase 7Sage law prep. The teacher is out o…
-
Happy to help, feel free to hit me up anytime if you need anything else. Good luck and take 'er easy!
-
Those are new problem sets that haven't gone up for sale on the add-ons page yet. All the problem sets you paid for in the ultimate package are now at the bottom of the curriculum portion of the syllabus right before the PTs start, in a category cal…
-
Thanks @blah170blah !
-
J.Y. doesn't really answer questions anymore since they've shifted to allowing the community to help one another. Unfortunately there is no hard and fast rule and it becomes more of an intuitive thing with practice. While rules that appear to spli…
-
What PT, Section and # Question is this?
-
I'd definitely save some of each question type for drilling later on between PTs because you will likely run into various issues on certain sections or question types and having fresh questions will help you hone those skills. I also felt like I did…
-
It's perfectly normal to get worse before you get better. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence of people doing decent on a diagnostic (150-165 range), and then going through a curriculum (7Sage or others), and then starting PTs only to see little t…
-
I'm not deep into PTs yet as I only started a few weeks ago and have had a lot of other work to do, but based on the advice that @blah170blah gave me, I've started to mix it up in order to combat these kinds of issues. I'd like to get to a PT in the…
-
Are you talking about a hard copy you ordered from LSAC? Or a PDF version. If it's the former it sounds like a printing error and you should call LSAC or whomever you bought it from. If it's the latter, well it still sounds like a printing error but…
-
No one who goes K-JD will have graduated college before submitting their applications, and I don't know how they would find out you would be graduating in August versus May or June before you show up to law school. You're almost no different than mo…
-
@DumbHollywoodActor makes a great point, and I think 7Sage is often very hesitant to make blanket statements like "some statements can't weaken or strengthen arguments" since there are almost always exceptions to such things, though I'm sure there a…
-
I don't see any reason why some statements couldn't be used to strengthen or weaken arguments. Surely they make for weaker agents of strengthening or weakening based on their very nature, but if no other statements fit the mold, then why couldn't th…
-
I like stats like these: http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/2014-2015-admissions-cycle-data-through-june-5th/ Especially the breakdown at the bottom where less than 2,500 people hit a 170+. 7Sagers FTW!
-
@alejoroarios we don't lose anything we had, all those problem sets are in the "Old Problem Sets" section at the end of the curriculum portion of the syllabus just before the PTs start. What we aren't getting is the hard questions in the new problem…
-
Go down to the bottom of the curriculum portion of the syllabus, right before the PTs start and you should see a section called "Old Problem Sets" which has the ones you bought previously. Much of the new stuff has not been put on sale yet as far as…
-
@hrjones44 While I'm not an admissions expert, I have read up on things like this a lot so I'll give it a go. It was hard to tell if a) you had already gotten into this school and were telling them to wait on the score for scholarship purposes, b) …
-
Here's a writeup of what I did for LG practice and it really helped a lot and I find myself often having several extra minutes after finishing LG sections. After using this methodology they went from my worst to best section. http://classic.7sage.…
-
If you're talking about the new versus old problem sets then you can find the old ones at the bottom of the curriculum portion of the syllabus before the PTs start. Otherwise you might be describing a bug that I have only encountered when I have tri…
-
As far as I know it would only work for whole PTs because if you weren't filling in every answer for a given PT since you only drilled certain questions, then all the blank ones should be counted wrong. However if you have a spreadsheet for these …
-
Susceptible to proof would mean it can be proven or disproven. Think of it as a capability to be affected by proof, or what in scientific terms is called falsifiable. The existence of God is not susceptible to proof since it can neither be proven or…
-
They have been making some upgrades which has caused some intended changes as well as some bugs. I can access LG explanations in the app at the moment. Not sure about the main site right now.