@puglover glad it helped! I also agree with @"Forever Addicted to Coffee" --it's really a matter of continued exposure to the various passage types and understanding their structure.
@yunonsie Hm, I don't think they're the same statements.
Let's look at your statement first: /C --> /A & /B.
"And" statements in the necessary can be split. So we could split this to say:
/C --> /A
AND
/C --> /B
This means that wh…
I think this is embedded logic, but hopefully someone else can correct me if I'm wrong.
There's a basic "If x then y" statement, so we know there's going to be a "-->" relationship between the two sides.
"If C does not occur" is simple to diag…
I fool-proof whole sections. I left a comment on a different post about the methods I followed, and it's worked well for me.
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/28076/diagraming-logic-games
@mpereira962D I think the trick is to revis…
If you're in the early stage of your studying, I strongly recommend the Pacifico method of fool-proofing games.
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/2737/logic-games-attack-strategy/p1
I left a comment on a different post about how I …
I've been told that RC passage subject matter doesn't matter--at least it shouldn't. The LSAT isn't designed to test your understanding of a topic or general reading skills. It's far different from the kind of reading and internalization we've been …
I've found it helpful to reframe the stimulus as a "How come... but still...?" question. (Ex: "How come farmers report increased spinach production but the number people with vitamin K deficiency is still increasing?")
The correct AC will answer th…
Some; more than one.
EDIT: Ooh interesting-- just found a definition on Powerscore.
https://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/bid-153449-lsat-quantity-terminology-some-few-several-and-many/
"By definition, several means three or more (but often less t…
Hi @magdiel_kobe , I followed the method of another 7Sager named Pacifico
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/2737/logic-games-attack-strategy/p1
It's effective because it provides a little more structure than deciding haphazardly to…
Yes, proficiency definitely comes with practice! Everyone is different, but I'd say I saw a huge improvement after foolproofing about 15 LG sections (so around 60 games).
@d_114400 If you search the forums, you'll find a post by 7Sager named Pacifico. He has a great method for foolproofing as well. I don't like to drill LG by type only because it's not an accurate representation of a full LG section. For example, if …
@swanganie Ok, sounds good. I put PT61 in my study schedule for next week. I usually take PTs early in the week (Mon/Tues) but I can wait until later in the week to BR and score.
Try to find synonyms for conditional logic indicators that are confusing. To "permit" something is to allow it. A sufficient condition is something that triggers, enables, activates, or allows the necessary to be true.
"A always permits B" means "A…
Hi @"Burden.of.Floof" , I'm interested too-- been scoring at about the same numbers and am looking to improve timing strategies as well. I'm already at mid-40 PTs but am happy to review with the group to get the most out of all the questions. Thanks…
@joonwookang I'm a bit confused.. Will you be going over LR or LG in this session on 12/9? In your post you use LR but then the Zoom session is called "Logic Games: A Systematic Approach"?