Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
SoCal Japorean
About
- Username
- SoCal Japorean
- Joined
- Visits
- 17
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
That was very helpful. Thank you so much Anne!
-
Another aspect of pattern recognition is recognizing the different patterns of wrong answers and how to eliminate them in a quick manner in order to save time for harder Questions. IE. Recognizing scope shifts and common errors in conditional logic …
-
If you have time to drill, then do all of them. It builds experience and familiarity. I do think that the answers are much more clear cut in 1-20 than in 60-70. I think that most of the "difficulty" is that the old PT's use language more formally th…
-
I'll take a crack at the explanation. The core of the argument is this: Culture that lacked a word for "something" ---> Likely did not have contact with that "something" There is an assumption that there are not other relevant factors that wo…
-
Okie Dokie. A) Jeanne --> City chorus --> Renowned Therefore Jeanne --> Excellent singer The Structure of the argument is valid. This flaw (if any) would be requiring Renowned to mean being Excellent Singer (Scope Shift) Rolfe -->…
-
Yeah, Hang in there, all you need is a short break to let everything sink in.
-
I'll take a whack at it KOC.The core of the stimulus is like this: Daisies --> Chrysanthemum "Some" Edible Therefore Daises "Some" Edible This cannot be inferred. This is a very common LSAT conditional logic error. The flaw is that you are t…
-
Glad that it all worked out for you brainwvs!