Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Steven_B-1
About
- Username
- Steven_B-1
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,938
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Congratulations!!!
-
Congratulations!!! Glad to hear you persevered and made a huge +20 point leap!!
-
Last 2 PTs were 170 and 175. I'd love to join and share strategies/ideas!
-
I'm up for it!
-
Hi, I wouldn’t mind helping the group you create with some guidance and “lessons” about at least how to break into the 160s. I’m currently scoring between 165-175 with my best score being a 175 on PT 76. I find it very helpful to talk over question…
-
First of all, don't despair. It's okay to still be making mistakes even after completing the CC. The CC builds your foundation but now you need to put that into action, and apply all that you've learned on specific questions and drilling sets. I do…
-
I personally only ever took 2 PTs between 1-35 and then followed 7sages advice to use those only for drilling. I cannot tell you how much I improved by drilling from Those by question type so try not to just do them for the sake of doing them.
-
I'd love to join a session!
-
What i do is look at my analytics and if i am weak on NA questions for example, i create choose the PT range from which i want to draw questions and then under "filter by tags" you can choose which question type you want to filter for. Then you can…
-
I'm up for it - at the 165-170 mark right now.
-
No choice but to keep on pushing, good luck!
-
The question is: how are you studying? Are you doing in-depth review of the mistakes you're making? Are you jorunaling your mistakes to learn from them? If you're at the 120-130s, then you're still making basic reading errors, you might still be unf…
-
Thank you for bumping this
-
I'm up for it ! scoring in the 160s (sometimes low, sometimes high) and looking to get into the 175+ range
-
Don't even sweat it. BR the test, start a wrong answer journal and keep pushing through the course and learning.
-
Yes it is okay. There isn't a limit to how much you could weaken. So destroying the argument completely falls within the subset of what we call "weaken."
-
I like the demon simply because of the drilling feature on their app which automatically feeds you questions at the level it assess you're at. So, as you start being more accurate, you'll start getting harder and harder questions which makes studyin…
-
DIdn't even know there was a full-passge view. I might have to try this on the LSAC website when doing my next PT.
-
Same, don't sweat it!
-
Not at all! Make a plan and go for it. Aim for 170 !! and you'll land your 160 with ease. Don't underestimate yourself, you can do it.
-
At least it's not the same pattern i've recognized on my tests: Error 404: brain no work
-
Congratulations!!!! Thanks for the monday dose of inspiration.
-
Following. I've always wondered this. Don't want to pay for a tutor without having a good idea of what a great lesson should look like.
-
Following.
-
It would be if NOT L and NOT Q -> Y . Is it not?
-
Are you BR every question and really figuring out why each answer is wrong and why 1 answer is correct? I've seen most of my improvement from taking things nice and slow at the beginning and thinking through each question, irrespective of how "easy"…
-
A says - the claim is required to establish the conclusion - meaning that if we cross out or eliminate the claim referenced, the conclusion would no longer be supported. However, the first sentence of the paragraph, which isn't being disputed and w…
-
Happens to me all the time lol, I've tried slowing down a little bit and it has helped somewhat.
-
Good point ^. I suppose they should just be called sufficient premises/statements/ or whatever. The question would ask: which one of the following statements guarantees the conclusion? Makes a lot more sense.
-
Congrats and good luck!