I'll just add on and explain the 'or' relationship now with the same in out game.
Rule: /A-->B
If I tell you A is out(/A) then the sufficient condition of our rule kicks and now B must be picked. Alternatively, is B is out (/B) then A must be p…
I found this logic very confusing at first. I think the best way of understanding it is with an in out game. Lets give it a try.
We have two options to pick from (A and B ). We are able to choose one of each item to be picked, however we like, as l…
Fool proof as soon as you are able to. This is an awesome way to start your post-CC studying as well. Also, I think a day or two of CC review would be time well spent. I cannot even explain how helpful it would have been if I took the time to make f…
That method for LG is fantastic! You'll start to see a slow progression towards getting faster and also more accurate at games.
As for LR, I would focus on this heavy. Considering LR is half the test, make sure that LR has your priority until your …
Often is a word that, in some way or another, points to a trend. A trend would have to be more than one instance of a phenomena. I believe you correctly eliminated C because of its unsupported broad conclusion. In this particular question, the conte…
@akistotle You are very correct about individual differences. I was just trying to articulate that the method we are using is at least sufficient in regards to improving one person's score.
The last BR score I had was about a month ago. I got a 17…
I would make sure that you feel really good with argument structure first. After you can quickly identify the structure, definitely revisit the CC and go over flaws. Flaws are a crux of being able to predict the answer choices in strengthening, weak…
So first off, I'm pretty much in the same boat as you. I have currently have a 162 and I am BRing in the 170 range. Maybe I am not in the place to give you perfect advice, but I can say that what I am doing is producing solid uphill gains.
I want t…
To further add onto what @Kewlaidd was saying, this happens sometimes with SA question types that were labeled MSS or strengthening. LSAC might change the question type to save their own butts. Almost all weakening questions have the 'most' in them …
Your conditionals express exactly what the english states. I think it would be best to drill "except" into your brain via flashcards. Through your examples, you have proven to yourself that logically, this makes sense to put it as group 3. Drill tha…
@TheMikey Will do! Would you happen to have a link for the book? I am having mixed results searching online. If not, it's totally fine. Much appreciated.
@nevadacity37 I had a 141 in January as well. Thank you for the kind words. And, of course, congratulations on your high level of consistency! I'll be celebrating with you in a few months, just you wait.
I tried it once, but there were so many things I needed to work on that timing was out of scope.
After just one recording, I found myself yelling "FOUR MINUTES ON THIS QUESTION?!? MOVE ON OMG". It was really awesome. I can't wait until I am at the…
What can I say you two!! This thank you for the thoughtful replies.
@TheMikey I would have to say that I think I have the fundamentals down. There is always more learning to do, but I feel confident that I have a solid understanding of them. I will…
That just puts a smile all my face knowing you are achieving at a high level, congrats!
I will keep at my BRing. Would you recommend I start doing harder drills right now? That sounds like an awesome approach to questions. The only saving grace for…
I totally agree with the benefits from it! @"Alex Divine"
@TheMikey It sure would sway me to study for the LSAT.
I wonder how it will affect this cycle. Maybe more people that are less ready (aka- lower scorers) will try and take it. Nevertheless,…
@TheMikey said:
it really really depends. I think there are cases where the weak sounding AC in a hard question is right, but typically I think for harder NA questions you will find them screwing with you with the right AC instead of having so…