A diagnostic is meaningless. If you didn't do well, who cares? You can study and get that score way higher. Put in the work, and I guarantee you that you will laugh about your diagnostic later on.
I got like a 140something on my diagnostic, my most…
@dennisgerrard said:
Thanks for this boost and gift for September LSAT taker. I will do it seriously as I can and join the review.
I can't find PT81 on my syllabus though.
I can't find it either. Hmm.. this is weird..
I just hope we don't get a misc game, that is the only thing making me nervous. Everything else is fine. But either way, misc game or not, I'm motivated to get this test over with 8)
I guess identifying structure in LR questions would be ok, but actually do the questions and not just look at its structure, right? :P
Main conclusion questions in RC just basically means what was the passage about and what is the point that it was…
You can begin from PT 1, but if you're food proofing games by game type then you have to go out of order. I personally think that fool proofing by game type is better, but doing it by PT can help too.
You can try it I guess, but I think that a possible negative is that starting with harder questions may lower your confidence when you hit the easier ones.
It's just a soft. I don't think it will give you a significant boost, since, your numbers will mostly determine your outcomes. It'll be a small factor for admissions committees to compare you against another applicant with similar numbers, I suppos…
@LSATcantwin said:
@TheMikey said:
haha I'll check the voice out when I PT again
I usually just roll with the default, which is I think Jennifer or something?
Lol thread is old. But you should check it out. It's B…
yup! F-->J
if it were J-->F then it would read the reverse of the statement "Jack must wear every colour Fred wears" to "Fred must wear every colour Jack wears"
Tbh, I just did the misc games from the earlier PTs and just tried my best to make game boards I'm familiar with (or something similar to them) fit the weird game.
By argument structure, do you mean argument part questions? Even if you don't, what you do for that Q type is what you do for all other argument based LR questions. What I did to get through this was just drill un-timed. Honestly, it sucks but if yo…
@apublicdisplay said:
@TheMikey said:
still yet to find the pencil that will get me a 170+
Necessary but not sufficient
or we're all crazy and a pencil does nothing for your score ?
Continue to do what you previously learned by moving onto something new and just doing the old Q type/game type you learned every once in a while in between the new stuff.
After you BR if you still are having trouble with a question then watch the video for it. Or if you obviously still got a Q wrong during BR, watch the video.
No no no no no. Don't look at stuff for the LSAT for a while. The VERY earliest you should be looking at the LSAT is maybe junior year if you're trying to take it and apply during your senior year to go K-JD. But even then, taking at least a year of…
Newer LR is def a bit different than older LR. I think the thing to keep in mind most is that whatever you pre-phrase with new LR, just keep an open mind in the answer choices. You may have the perfect pre-phrase, but the correct AC may word it very…