Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
TimLSAT180
About
- Username
- TimLSAT180
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,249
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Hey! Seems like you're new to 7sage. Welcome So, I started my LSAT journey towards the end of December with a different prep test company, and then I switched to 7sage at the beginning of February. I'm halfway through the curriculum right now and I…
-
Is this offer still on the table? I would very much be interested to receive any advice!
-
I think most people would say to finish the CC first and then implement the fool-proof method for LG. I think this is the best course to take because without having learned the logic and advanced logic portions of the CC, it's really difficult to ev…
-
@Jessica_Kuba such inspiring words Jessica! I just want to add some personal advice of my own. I've been studying for the LSAT for only about 2 months now and really, the thing that has motivated beyond anything to study for this test is the process…
-
@CinnamonTea Yeah it's basically provided in the comments section and David does that for almost every passage that you encounter on 7sage. What I like to do is use his breakdown as a template and basically modify it by adding other things to it tha…
-
Question for @jkatz1488 : What is good about Wireless Philosophy that helps you with the LSAT? I also read the Economist and NY and do sudoku, but I don't know about Wireless Philosophy so if you could elaborate more on that, I would appreciate it! …
-
Thanks for the link @"montaha.rizeq" && LOL'ed at the buffalo reference @"nessa.k13.0"
-
So, usually when people say that they have trouble with a particular type of LR question, it's not really about the type of question (weakening, strengthening, resolve the paradox, etc.). I mean some people say that they are good at strengthening qu…
-
@BenjaminSF You're totally right about understanding the "why" of Lawgic. Another good example is the infamous statement: I only work on Tuesdays. If I were to translate this statement into Lawgic based on my comment, it would be T -> W. But, thi…
-
I'm going through the Introduction to Logic Lesson right now and I can help you out with that. Even though both "sunny" and "Philadelphia" come after the logical indicator "always", what you want to look out for is which word comes immediately afte…
-
I'll take a stab at this because I came across the exact same problem when I doing an LG section for PT32 (Game #1 Rule#3). So, basically you want to think of everything that comes before the "unless" as A and everything that comes after "unless" as…
-
I'll give you a good example of what happened with me just yesterday when I was drilling an RC passage timed. After doing all the questions, I BR-ed and changed two answers, both of which turned out to be the case in which I had changed from the cor…
-
Thanks @danielznelson! Another thing I wanted to mention is that I also did the online course for Testmasters for a month and I learned a lot of techniques which brought me up from a 146 on my diagnostic to around a 160 on my second PT. But the issu…
-
I don't know if you were able to participate in Jonathan Wang's awesome webinar yesterday, but one of the things that he pointed out that I think is probably the essence of the LSAT is that when you approach this test, you have to approach it with a…
-
I think other 7sagers might have a better advice than the one I can offer since I've only been prepping for just a little over a month, but I think if there is a pattern in the type of passage that is giving you the hardest time (maybe it's the subj…
-
I wholeheartedly agree with you on this. I've been doing the same thing (reading both the economist as well as the New Yorker) and I definitely feel like I'm more engaged with the RC passages. And just another word of advice to anybody who is prepar…
-
Thanks for the detailed explanation! This one was definitely one of the trickier questions (for me at least) because it had a subsidiary conclusion so I was confused as to which one was the main conclusion and which one was the subsidiary conclusion…
-
So I thought of doing multiple a day, but the problem with that is that I forget the inferences that I learned on that day the next day. So, what I've been doing that is much more effective is focusing one one game section per PT each day. I would d…
-
@Sami @bswise2 Hey guys I just wanted to thank you guys for writing up this post! This is something I haven't been doing and I just started today doing some untimed drilling of 10 questions of weaken, strengthen, and flaw questions and covering up …
-
Thanks Josh! I really appreciate your input. I'm right now doing the untimed drill for weaken, strengthen, and flaw questions and one thing I'm doing is covering up the question stem and answer choices at first and just looking at the argument and …
-
I would like to join in as well!
-
Hey Daniel it's Tim(I wrote this original post), thanks for the advice that you gave me today about how to approach drilling for logical reasoning. I looked at the LSAT analytics and I have trouble with flaw, strengthen, and weakening questions. Sta…