Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Zachary_P
About
- Username
- Zachary_P
- Joined
- Visits
- 955
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Also, it allows you to partly register before you officially pay for it. I haven't paid yet, but I have checked the box for "send scores to schools." There should be a blue link pertaining to CAS on the left side of the screen to get that process go…
-
I first learned LG with the PS methods, and while they are a good, basic intro to games, 7sage really digs deep into the logic behind the games, which is invaluable especially when it comes to some of the more recent "odd" games. You'll learn not on…
-
They also take into account relative cost/employment salaries! They just released the podcast today explaining the metrics behind it, and it's definitely worth a listen!
-
I second what @"Daniel.Sieradzki" observed. I would go so far to say the same holds true for MBT questions. I know I've encountered more than one MBT questions where the stimulus says something like "All politicians hold the position X" and the corr…
-
I'll take a stab at it... I believe when it says ""it is information that the argument takes for granted" it means there there is nothing to support that claim. So in a case like this, it is a premise that is unsupported by another premise; the auth…
-
I recommend the two step approach discussed in the curriculum. You basically ask yourself two questions: 1) Is it descriptively accurate? 2) Does it describe the flaw in this argument? If either of these fail, then you can eliminate it as an AC. In …
-
Wow. Thanks for this!
-
I'm game! RC is also my weakest section by quite a bit. Thanks!
-
As tough as it may seem at first, I would really encourage trying to view sufficient assumption questions like JY does. This questions rise to the level of outright validity, so while another AC may indeed strengthen the argument, only one will make…
-
I ran into a similar plateau, and the thing that helped me break out of it was really taking blind review seriously. If you've fool proofed LG, then that part of your score should be somewhat constant. (If you haven't, then this is an easy first ste…
-
The T14 is based on the US News and World Report Law School Rankings. Since the inception of the rankings, the top 14 schools had never dropped below 14 in the rankings... until this year. So, technically there could now be a "T13" of schools that h…
-
Congratulations! Best of luck!
-
I saw this! When in doubt about the meaning in a list, be specific, consider the implied meaning, and then always use the Oxford comma... See what I did there?
-
I'm a full time student, but as JY says, studying for the LSAT is your JOB. So I usually wake up and study for 2 hours, go to class, eat, workout, pray, homework etc., then I study from 7-10 for an average of 4-6 hours per day. But like Alex, once s…
-
Congratulations!
-
Congrats! Amazing!
-
@apublicdisplay @Thoughtful I need to clarify how I BR... I take a PT and BR the ones I circled. Then I check my scores. Then I go back again and fully work through the ones that I missed but didn't circle; these are the ones on which the LSAT "tric…
-
In my experience, that is okay! I BR and then grade it with the 7sage analytics tool. Then I go back and "BR" the ones that I missed that I did not circle. If I still get the wrong answer, then I know there is something I have missed in either the l…
-
@"Cant Get Right" Thanks for the reply. A lot of what you said makes sense. Time isn't really an issue. I usually finish the first run through of a section with around 5 minutes left and then go back to the questions I flagged. I do think grammar g…
-
"Thinking Like a Lawyer" is a fun blend of pop culture and relevant legal news. It's published by Above the Law.