Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
akistotle
About
- Username
- akistotle
- Joined
- Visits
- 7,872
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, ⭐, 🍌🍌
Comments
-
@bklsat05 said: Any advice on how to know when to skip a game? I just did PT 37 and I KNEW I should have skipped one but I pushed through got -2 on the sections I did and then didn't have time for the final... After reading the rules and tr…
-
If you are not constantly getting -0 or -1 on LG, then you should foolproof all the games. If you are, I think you first need to increase your BR score in LR/RC. You should write your own explanation when you BR. You will be able to see what you do…
-
I may be wrong, but I don't think we can make something like that because two curricula are different.....(I have done LSAT Trainer) That way if a student like myself who cannot afford to pay for the ultimate package, can still have access to mo…
-
@BinghamtonDave said: Just curious, where can we see the ranking of the section as a whole? I have not taken the exam, but just ran the analytics and it looks like only the first passage is 2/5. I think we can see it on Trends section of L…
-
@"Alan Cheuk" said: https://media.giphy.com/media/7kn27lnYSAE9O/giphy.gif Oh no, I'm 13 days late! Here are the August 2017 awards: Gold - $100 giftcard @"Alex Divine" Silver - $50 giftcard @"LSATcantwin" @"TheMikey"…
-
@skrishnan said: Hey Thanks, I wasn't aware, just edited my post. Also, looked at this again today, and I can't believe i was stuck with this question yesterday! Haha Thank you so much though Great I edited my post as well.
-
@"Alex Divine" said: He answered this in a thread a while back, his original score was a 173. I think he only studied for three months in college before taking the test.
-
That is weird. I think you should call LSAC at 8pm (China time) to confirm.
-
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-19/ P1: Smokers ==correlation+-== Heart disease P2: Smokers ==correlation+-== Caffeine ——————————————————————– C: Caffeine ==correlation+-== Heart disease @"Mo Zubair" sa…
-
Hi @skrishnan, https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-27-section-4-question-07/ P: know a lot about history —> easy to impress intellectuals P: /(read a large number of history books) —> /(know a lot about history) ——————— C: /(…
-
@JayClarke242 said: So how often would you recommend redoing them? I recommend foolproofing all the games in PT1-35 unless you are constantly getting -0 on LG. I use a slightly altered version of @Pacifico's LG attack strategy (https://clas…
-
Many LG questions are "reincarnations" of past LGs, and you will see it once you foolproof all the games under PT1-35. If you memorize inferences, you will be able to make similar inferences in fresh games you haven't done.
-
@TheMikey said: After a year and 9 months of studying, I will hopefully be filing for a divorce with the LSAT after Saturday. It was (not) nice knowing you, but I have to move on baby. edit: just want to add, for the record, that she…
-
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-42-section-1-game-4/ @"Mike Baldwin" said: If O is given an S, then M must have a T and a U, but cannot have an S due to J having an S. Thus you would get J=S, K=T, L=U, M=U,T, and O=S,U,T. T…
-
@bklsat05 said: That might be a good idea. I just took an untimed LG section and did good in 40 mins. Game 3 was confusing by 4 was super easy You just have to be comfortable skipping around. When you are stuck, you always have to skip. You …
-
@nathanieljschwartz said: Hey i just recorded myself in my starbucks and people were staring at me as if i were naked Haha!
-
@LSATcantwin said: @akistotle Is your finger okay? I'm not quite sure it should bend like that just kidding! Haha! My finger is actually really bendy
-
@kkrystyna said: @akistotle said: @Victoria14 said: I'm not sure about recording myself, i'm not quite sure how to even set that up but i'll try any way. I think recording yourself will tremendously …
-
@bklsat05 said: I ended up only getting thru PT 1-8 LGs. I redid PT 1 LG the other day did -0 in 45 mins. Finished 3 games in 35 so I am getting better I feel but there just isn't enough time. I burned out an had to take 2 days off after not b…
-
@therealnas said: .... don't you see how this would weaken it? If none of the electric fish light up like it then the potential presumption that the non-electric fish lights up like them in hopes of appearing as electric is destroyed... The …
-
@TheLSAT said: Answer choice (B) also requires the assumption that there's a link between cats being chased and dying. The stimulus indicates that they get stuck in trees, that doesn't mean they die as a result. Oh that's right! (B) needs th…
-
B. Being chased by dogs is not the most common cause of death for cats. I don't know how it would strengthen the argument. What if it is the second most common cause? Maybe 50% are killed by sharks; 49% are killed by dogs; 1% die happily. If i…
-
I know I would definitely skip and miss this question if it appears on the LSAT [Phenomenon] • Cats walk very light-footed when compared to other species • Dogs dogs do not chase humans because humans do not get scared of dogs • Cats get…
-
It really depends on the game. But you have to remember that A /B indicates that either A or B has to be in. "A can't be added to the same class as B" If there are only two classes, then I think diagramming as A /B is ok. But if there are mo…
-
This is the original condition (2nd & 4th rule): /S ---> J ---> H Q12: If you add S --> /H (= H -->/S), it becomes /S ---> J ---> H -->/S. So with the new rule, the relationship "J ---> /S" is added. Combined with the…
-
You are welcome
-
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-6-section-4-game-4/ I don't know if I understand your game board clearly but I assume M is connected with J, K, and L (because that is what (D) tells us). But the last rule tells us M has to be conn…
-
From a logical perspective, I think it's "most." Also there was a great discussion on "almost all": https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/12445
-
Welcome!!!! @Freddy_D said: "PERSPICACITY" Can I have "Words I Didn't Know Existed" for $300, Alex? Welcome to the community, Maura and Clare!!! I just added the word and "perspicacious" to my LSAT vocabulary list.
-
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-67-section-4-question-08/ This is a PSA question, and the key here is "policy change" in the principle. [Principle] ・Burden of a proposed policy change would fall disproportionately on people with…