Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
akistotle
About
- Username
- akistotle
- Joined
- Visits
- 7,872
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, ⭐, 🍌🍌
Comments
-
@d931n027h said: Also what if "Jane will select neither the blue nor the black dress: Jane will not select Blue dress AND Black dress"?? Can you sum them up as J→/Blue + /Black? or do you have to separate them as J→/Blue AND J→/Black? …
-
@d931n027h said: If, "neither P nor K are cute", then can you say P+K→/C or do you have to keep them separate?? This would be separate because it means that "P are not cute" and "K are not cure" separately. P → not cute K → not cute P o…
-
@roychess said: @"Cant Get Right" said: None of that is wrong @roychess , but like you say: @roychess said: Some of what works for the LSAT will not fly In a college class. We're really only con…
-
@roychess said: @akistotle said: Thank you, @roychess, for explaining logic. I think 7Sagers do understand what "only if" means logically since we learn it in the Core Curriculum. As you can see from J.Y.'s comment, we were having …
-
Thank you, @roychess, for explaining logic. I think 7Sagers do understand what "only if" means logically since we learn it in the Core Curriculum. As you can see from J.Y.'s comment, we were having a discussion on how ambiguous English can be.
-
There is a post on Reddit about taking the LSAT in Beijing. If you haven't seen it, it might be helpful for you: https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/3vqjw0/my_experiences_taking_the_lsat_in_china/ I'm not certain, but is the June LSAT in Asia i…
-
Thank you, @hon132 for your detailed explanation! Your example has some issues, even though the factions fought, that doesn't mean their problems were never addressed. I think that even if they never address the issue of disagreement, it is po…
-
@"work all week" said: I think you are just judging B too harshly as if it's a MSS question or similar. While it's true that nothing is mentioned about staying in power, that doesn't really matter for this question. We just need a sentence t…
-
Maybe you should crop the photo to 2”x2” (195px x 195px). http://www.lsac.org//jd/lsat/day-of-test/photo-requirements/?view=1 LSAT photo requirements may not be so strict, but it certainly is better safe than sorry. It really depends on the proct…
-
Thank you so much Such an honor!!
-
Last week I was blind reviewing a question for several hours......in my dream. I don't remember exactly what the question was, but it was a bizarre argument and I couldn't figure it out while I was sleeping. lol I was like, "Wait, is this context? …
-
Hi @jackigoe ! @jackigoe said: I'm conflicted on whether or not to sort them chronologically and foolproof them in that order; or if I should sort them by category/difficulty in order to cement in pattern recognition. I sort them chronologi…
-
Hi @hello1002 ! While one adjective can modify two nouns, in this case, I think we can't interpret as 2) because the original sentence says "that they shared" (relative pronoun "that" + S V). The C and the E had differing interpretations of [{A} a…
-
Sorry I posted the above before refreshing this page. @"Alex Divine" said: If someone wants to find you they can. Namely, like the feds, lol. Law schools ain't got time to be tracking you down like a private investigator. You'll be good if yo…
-
@Kewlaidd said: No, just set your profile settings to private on all accounts. But this would have to include comments and groups and such. My accounts (including posts and groups) are all set private, but @jayjack34 & @"Alex Divine" are…
-
@jayjack34 said: Just saying as an investigator, it didn't matter how private an account was set to. I could find the information I was looking for in a matter of minutes. Since being an investigator I have scrubbed all of my social media ac…
-
@Freddy_D said: Fingers crossed for a test with 5 sections of LG Oh that would be great. I will pray for that...
-
In terms of questions on the LSAT, I think it's fine to think the negation of "few" as "most." Few are A = Some are A, most are not A Few dogs are evil = Some dogs are evil, but most dogs are not evil. Negation Few are not A = Some are not A, mo…
-
This is great! Bookmarking it My strategy is simple: "Read carefully! Spend time making inferences upfront! But don't spend TOO much time!" lol
-
You can find keywords in the test from this post: https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/11428/june-2017-lsat-real-experimental-sections-keywords If you cannot recall, you can discuss it in Official June LSAT Discussion Thread: https:/…
-
@"Hunt Lind" said: What does this mean? How do they curve? @akistotle said: Yikes....I wonder what the curve is.... In order to get a 170, you sometimes can to miss up to 11 or even 14 questions. It depends on the difficult…
-
I keep an Excel sheet too. I also video record myself doing section drills and full PTs, so I redo questions that took me more than 80 seconds...
-
@emichael said: I'm fairly confident that I can raise my score to my goal number by September, but also don't want to risk asking for letters now and realize in August that I want more time to study. How would you say I handle this? One of my …
-
Yikes....I wonder what the curve is....
-
@"Alex Divine" said: @Csuposki said: Hi everyone, I plan on fool proofing LG using the typical method of using the PT 1-35 bundle. I was just wondering what are people's thoughts on fool proofing LG by type versus just goi…
-
Yes. I sometimes even practice bubbling my name, the LSAC number, and the date of birth....lol
-
I do what's so-called Cookie Cutter Review on each PT. This seems to be working especially for Flaw questions. Whenever I do a Flaw question, I try to label the question as one of 19 common flaws. https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/19-common-argumen…